期刊文献+

英国铁路论坛的铁路噪声与欧盟政策述评 被引量:4

Review of the Viewpoint of UK Railway Forum and EU Policy on Railway Noise
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对英国铁路论坛一篇题为“铁路噪声与欧盟政策的主要问题——政府立场建议书”报告的分析与述评,结合我国铁路噪声防治和环境影响评价,提出一些可供我国铁路噪声控制参考的意见。铁路噪声降低目标的确定应进行成本效益分析。铁路噪声允许值的确定应考虑铁路噪声与其他类型噪声的烦扰度差别。铁路噪声的标准和防治应考虑既有线路和新建线路的区别。机车车辆的噪声辐射标准应考虑在用和新造的区别。重视噪声地图的作用,发展相关的技术。 A report named Railway Noise and EU Policy : Key Issues——Position Paper by the Railway Forum provided by UK Railway Forum was reviewed in this paper. Combined with railway noise treatment and environmental impact assessment in China, Some proposal was offered for domestic railway noise control. Costbenefit analysis should be mandatory in the process of setting noise abatement goals. Limit values for railway noise should incorporate the annoying difference between railway noise and other types of noise. Standard and treatment of railway noise should retain the existing distinction between existing and new infrastructure. Noise creation standard should not be applied retrospectively to existing vehicles. Noise mapping should be paid attention to and relative technique should be developed.
出处 《铁道劳动安全卫生与环保》 2007年第3期141-145,共5页 Railway Occupational Safety Health & Environmental Protection
关键词 铁路噪声 噪声控制政策 建议 railway noise policy of noise cotrol suggestion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1The Railway Forum. Railway Noise and EU Policy: Key Issues,Position Paper by The Railway Forum [ DB/OL]. 2000. www. railwayforum.com.
  • 2Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise [ J ]. Official Journal of European Communities, L189, 18 July 2002.
  • 3ISO/DIS1996 - 1 : 2001 Acoustics-Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise, Part 1 : Basic Quantities and Assessment Procedures[ S].
  • 4Φdegaard & Danneskiold-Samsφe A/S (ODS), Copenhagen, (with Akustik-Data, PSIA-Consult, STUVA, Frama 01 and Politechnico Torino), A Study of European Priorities and Strategies for Railway Noise Abatement, Main Report and Two Annexes, October 2001.
  • 5铁道部铁计[2006]44号,铁路建设项目环境影响评价噪声振动源强取值和治理原则指导意见[Z].
  • 6ISO/DIS 3095 : 2001, Railway Applications-Acoustics-Measurement of Noise Emitted by Railbound Vehicles[ S].

同被引文献24

  • 1吴卫平,王东,季方,蔡莹娟,窦静雅.我国运输外部成本计算分析[J].铁道经济研究,2009(2):11-12. 被引量:10
  • 2陈婷,陆雍森.交通噪声污染经济损失估算方法比较研究[J].交通环保,2004,25(5):15-17. 被引量:8
  • 3马筠,辜小安,焦大化,张秀华,张春华.制订铁路环境噪声标准的基本方法[J].铁道劳动安全卫生与环保,2005,32(3):108-111. 被引量:3
  • 4WG Railway Noise of the European Commission. Position Paper on the European strategies and priorities for railway noise abatement [ R ]. 2003, Version 19403:36.
  • 5Directive 1996/48/EC of the Council of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system.
  • 6Commission Decision of 30 May 2002 : Concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling stock subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system referred to in Article 6( 1 ) of Directive 96/48/EC.
  • 7Directive 2001/16/EC of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system.
  • 8Commission Decision of 23 December 2005 : concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem ' rolling stock-noise' of the trans-European conventional rail system.
  • 9Directive 2002/49/EC OF the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002: Relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise.
  • 10Marco Masoero, Uffe Degn. A Study of European Priorities and Strategies for Railway Noise Abatement [ R ]. Odegaard & Danneskiold- SamsCe A/S, Brussels Belgium. 2002,01. 921:57- 63.

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部