期刊文献+

论技术哲思的三个阶段 被引量:2

Three Stages in the Course of Philosophy of Technological Thinking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人们对技术的哲思经历了“无思之思”、“有思之思”和“反思之思”三个阶段。“无思之思”是哲学史中对技术的不显眼的、零散的思考;“有思之思”是自技术哲学诞生以后,逐渐形成的对技术所作的较为全面、系统的思考;“反思之思”是对于技术哲学自身发展的一种批判性反思,昭示了当代技术哲学发展的新趋向。 The course of philosophy of technological thinking goes through three stages: "ideology with little thinking", "ideology with thinking" and "ideology with reflection". The first stage "ideology with little thinking" means inconspicuous and scattered thinking on technology in history of philosophy. The second stage "ideology with thinking" is gradually formed more complete and systemic thinking on technology. While "ideology with reflection" is a kind of critical reflection on the development of philosophy of technology itself, which reveals the new developmental tendency of contemporary philosophy of technology.
出处 《河池学院学报》 2007年第3期5-10,共6页 Journal of Hechi University
关键词 技术哲思 无思之思 有思之思 反思之思 技术哲学 经验转向 philosophy of technological thinking ideology with little thinking ideology with thinking ideology with reflection philosophy of technology the empirical turn
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[2]B.Gille(ed).Histoire des Techniques.Paris.Gallimard.1977,P1475.
  • 2[7]Carl Mitcham:Thinking through technology--the path between Engineering and Philosophy.1994.
  • 3[9]Robert E.McGinn.What Is Technology,in P.T.Durbin(ed):Research in philosophy & Technology (Vol.1,1978),P181.
  • 4[11]Arnold Pacey.The Culture of Technology,Basil Blackwell Publisher Limited.1983,P4.
  • 5[12]Rachel Laudan (ed).The nature of technological knowledge:Are models of scientific change relevant? Dordrecht,The netherlands:Reidel.1984,P83~104.
  • 6[13]W.G.Vincenti.What engineers know and how they know it:Analytical studies from aeronautical history.Baltimore,MD:Johns Hopkins University Press,1990.
  • 7[14]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about technology:Foundations in the philosophy of technology.New York:Seven Bridges Press,1999.
  • 8[15]H.Achterhuis.American Philosophy of Technology:The Empirical Turn.Bloomington and Indianapolis:Indiana University Press,2001.P2~8.
  • 9[16]Peter Kroes.Introduction[A].The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology[C].Netherlands:Elsevier Science Ltd.2000:xxvii-xxxiv.

同被引文献12

  • 1程政举.秦代的告诉制度[J].殷都学刊,2006,27(1):26-28. 被引量:4
  • 2骆元卡.论公务协助引起的国家补偿[J].百色学院学报,2006,19(5):107-110. 被引量:2
  • 3汉·司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1963.
  • 4[唐]杜佑.通典[M].北京:中华书局,1988.
  • 5唐·长孙无忌等.唐律疏议[M].刘俊文点校.北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 6明·董说.七国考[M].北京:中华书局,1956.
  • 7战国·韩非.韩非予[M].陈奇猷,校注.韩非子新校注[M].北京:中华书局,2000.
  • 8战国·商鞅.商君书[M].石磊,译注.北京:中华书局,2009.
  • 9汉·桓宽.盐铁论[M].王利器,校注.盐铁论校注[M].北京:中华书局.1992.
  • 10《简明不列颠百科全书》编辑部,译编.简明不列颠百科全书(五)[Z].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1986.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部