期刊文献+

预期寿命损失法定量评估区域环境健康风险 被引量:3

A Specific Method of Quantitative Assessing the Environment Health Risk:Loss of Life Expectancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 预期寿命损失(Loss of life expectancy)是一种将环境污染导致的致癌风险和非致癌风险进行归一化评价的环境健康风险评价技术,有无暴露条件下的各年龄段人口的预期剩余寿命之差即为该暴露条件下的预期寿命损失。应用预期寿命损失法对杭州地区在一定致癌风险下的预期剩余寿命及预期寿命损失当量进行了分析,并对预期寿命损失进行了人群差异性研究。结果表明,在单位致癌风险(10-5)的污染暴露下,杭州地区男性和女性在0岁时的预期剩余寿命分别为79.4和83.2a;预期寿命损失当量分别为50.6和51.7min;不同年龄段上的过剩死亡量的分布呈正态分布,女性在84岁左右达到峰值,男性在80岁左右达到峰值;50岁之后人群预期寿命损失随年龄的增大而下降,说明环境因素不是老龄化人群死亡的主要原因;杭州市近10年的预期寿命损失呈增加趋势。 Loss of life expectancy (LLE) was being proposed as a new method to quantitative assessing the environmental health risk, which could evaluate and compare the health risk caused by carcinogen and non-carcinogen pollutants in a unity metric. It can be evaluated by the difference of life expectancy exposed to certain pollutants for individuals or not in life table, and thus to measure the magnitude of toxic effects. Based on the statistical data of individual population in Hangzhou, the life expectancy and the loss of life expectancy intensity under the unit cancer risk (10^-5) were calculated, the differentia in ages was studied as well. The results showed that the life expectancy was 79.4 year and 83.2 year for male and female respectively at zero year old. And 50.6 min and 51.7 min of loss of life expectancy were found for male and female respectively. The distribution of over death at special years old followed the normal-distribution, which would go up to a peak at 84 years old for female and 80 years old for male respectively. Environment pollutant was not a key factor for death since the loss of life expectancy decreased with the increasing age after 50. The loss of life expectancy in Hangzhou in last decade increased recently.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期1579-1584,共6页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 杭州市发展和改革委员会规划研究项目 杭州市环境保护科研计划项目
关键词 预期寿命损失 健康风险评价 污染 暴露 loss of life expectancy health risk assessment pollutant exposure
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1USEPA(US Environmental Protection Agency).Supplement risk assessment.Part 1 Guidance for public health risk assessment.EPA/601/5-89-001,1995.
  • 2Gamo M,Oka T,et al.A method evaluating population risks from chemical exposure:a case study concerning prohibition of chlordane use in Japan[J].Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,1995,21:151-157.
  • 3杨宇,胡建英,陶澍.天津地区致癌风险的预期寿命损失分析[J].环境科学,2005,26(1):168-172. 被引量:41
  • 4曾光明,卓利,钟政林,张盼月,李新民.水环境健康风险评价模型及其应用[J].水电能源科学,1997,15(4):28-33. 被引量:124
  • 5Gamo M,Oka T,et al.Ranking the risks of 12 major environmental pollutants that occur in Japan[J].Chemosphere,2003,53:277-284.
  • 6Nakanishi J,Gamo M,et al.Environmental risk evaluation of chemicals:achievements of the project and seeds for future-development of metrics for evaluating risks[J].Chemosphere,2003,53(4):389-398.
  • 7杭州市统计局.杭州市2005年统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2005.
  • 8Yang Y,Tao S,et al.Human exposure and health risk of α-,β-,γ-and δ-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCHs) in Tianjin,China[J].Chemosphere,2005,60:753-761.
  • 9Gofman J W.Radiation and human health[M].Sierra Club Books,1981.
  • 10Gofman J W.Radiation-induced cancer from low-dose exposure:an independent analysis.Committee for nuclear responsibility[M].1990.

二级参考文献7

共引文献161

同被引文献122

引证文献3

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部