期刊文献+

头孢噻肟及他唑巴坦对β-内酰胺酶稳定性的初步研究

Study on enzyme stability of cefotaxime/tazobactam to β-lactamases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测定头孢噻肟钠他唑巴坦钠(1∶1,2∶1,4∶1,8∶1,16∶1)及单组分头孢噻肟钠(CTX)对13种产酶株β-内酰胺酶粗提液的水解率及抑酶保护率,并与复方制剂头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠和哌拉西林钠他唑巴坦钠进行比较。方法生物法测定β-内酰胺酶对抗生素的相对水解率以及抑酶保护率。结果不同配比头孢噻肟钠他唑巴坦钠的相对水解率均显著低于头孢噻肟钠单用(P<0.01);与头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠(CPZ/SB 1∶1)和哌拉西林钠他唑巴坦钠(PIPC/TB 8∶1)的相对水解率相比,CTX/TB(1∶1)的相对水解率有明显降低(P<0.05),且显著低于CTX/TB(8∶1,16∶1)(P<0.05),也低于CTX/TB(2∶1,4∶1)但无统计学意义。结论CTX/TB(1∶1)抑酶效应优于其他配比,且优于同类复方制剂CPZ/SB(1∶1)及PIPC/TB(8∶1),因此,他唑巴坦起到了增强头孢噻肟对β-内酰胺酶的稳定性和抑酶保护作用。 Objective:To evaluate the relative rate of hydrolysis of cefotaxime/tazobactam(CTX/TB1 : 1, 2 : 1, 4 : 1, 8 : 1, 16 : 1 ) 13stariβ-lactamases, which were compared with cefoperazone/sulbactam(CPZ/SB1 : 1) and piperacillin/tazobactam(PIPC/TB 8 : 1 ), and to estimate the ability of tazobactam in preventing hydrolysis of cefotaxime. Methods:The relative rate of hydrolysis of CTX/TB and the ability of enzyme inhibitors in protecting cefotaxime from hydrolyzing byβ-lactamases were measured by biological method. Results:The relative rate of hydrolysis of each combination of CTX/TB was significantly lower than that of CTX alone; Compared with the relative rate of CPZ/SB and PIPC/TB, CTX/TB( 1 : 1 ) was lower( P〈0. 05), and also lower than CTX/TB(8 : 1,16 : 1 ) (P〈 0. 05). Conclusion: On aspect of inhibition of β-lactamases ,CTX/TB(1 :1) was better than other combination of CTX/TB, and also better than CPZ/SB and PIPC/TB, therefore, the availability of compounds to cefotaxime and tazobactam could greatly improve the ability of β-lactamases.
出处 《四川生理科学杂志》 2007年第2期59-61,共3页 Sichuan Journal of Physiological Sciences
关键词 生物法 超广谱Β-内酰胺酶 他唑巴坦 头孢噻肟 Biological methond Extended-spectrum β-lactamases Tazobactam Cefotaxime
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]A runoff S C,Jacobs M R,Johenning S,et al.Comparative activities of the β-lactamases inhibitor YTR830,sodium clavulanate,and sulbactam combined with amoxicillin or ampicillin[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1984; 26:580-584.
  • 2[2]National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Performance standards for antimicro-bial susceptibility testing.14th informational supplement[J].National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.2004;24(1):35-37.
  • 3[6]Li J T,Mitsuzo K,Makoto K,et al.β-lactamases stability and antibacterial[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1981 ;20:171-177.
  • 4[7]Babic M,Hujer A.M.,Bonomo R.A.,et al.What's new in antibiotic resistance? Focus on β-lactamases[J].Drug Resistance Updates,2006,9:142-156.
  • 5谢芬,刘蓉,周黎明,王浴生.铜绿假单胞菌对头孢菌素类抗生素耐药机制的初步研究[J].四川生理科学杂志,2005,27(3):105-107. 被引量:8

二级参考文献6

  • 1许宏涛,陈东科,俞云松,张秀珍.多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌产β-内酰胺酶耐药机制研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2005,15(1):20-22. 被引量:81
  • 2许宏涛,张秀珍.医院感染铜绿假单胞菌多重耐药机制的研究[J].中国抗感染化疗杂志,2005,5(3):141-145. 被引量:58
  • 3[1]Stove CK, Pham QX, et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa PAO1 an opportunistic pathogen. Nature, 2000; 406: 959~ 964
  • 4[2]National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards . Performance standards for antimicrobiol susceptibility testing . fourteenth informational supplement. M2-A8 and M7-A6 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards . 2004; 24( 1 ): 35~ 38
  • 5[4]Coudron PE. Moland ES. Thomson KS. Occurrence and detection of AmpC beta-lactamases among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis isolates at a veterans medical center. Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000; 38( 5 ): 1791 ~ 1796
  • 6[5]Subha A. Devi VR. Ananthan S. AmpC beta-lactamase producing multidrug resistant strains of Klebsiella spp. & Escherichia coli isolated from children under five in Chennai. Indian journalof medical of medical research,2003, Jan; 117:13~18

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部