期刊文献+

Effect of Variable Selection on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization:a Flight Vehicle Example 被引量:7

Effect of Variable Selection on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization:a Flight Vehicle Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Different multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) problems are formulated and compared. Two MDO formulations are applied to a sounding rocket in order to optimize the performance of the rocket. In the MDO of the referred vehicle, three disciplines have been considered, which are trajectory, propulsion and aerodynamics. A special design structure matrix is developed to assist data exchange between disciplines. This design process uses response surface method (RSM) for multidisciplinary optimization of the rocket. The RSM is applied to the design in two categories: the propulsion model and the system level. In the propulsion model, RSM determines an approximate mathematical model of the engine output parameters as a function of design variables. In the system level, RSM fits a surface of objective function versus design variables. In the first MDO problem formulation, two design variables are selected to form propulsion discipline. In the second one, three new design variables from geometry are added and finally, an optimization method is applied to the response surface in the system level in order to find the best result. Application of the first developed multidisciplinary design optimization procedure increased accessible altitude (performance index) of the referred sounding rocket by twenty five percents and the second one twenty nine. Different multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) problems are formulated and compared. Two MDO formulations are applied to a sounding rocket in order to optimize the performance of the rocket. In the MDO of the referred vehicle, three disciplines have been considered, which are trajectory, propulsion and aerodynamics. A special design structure matrix is developed to assist data exchange between disciplines. This design process uses response surface method (RSM) for multidisciplinary optimization of the rocket. The RSM is applied to the design in two categories: the propulsion model and the system level. In the propulsion model, RSM determines an approximate mathematical model of the engine output parameters as a function of design variables. In the system level, RSM fits a surface of objective function versus design variables. In the first MDO problem formulation, two design variables are selected to form propulsion discipline. In the second one, three new design variables from geometry are added and finally, an optimization method is applied to the response surface in the system level in order to find the best result. Application of the first developed multidisciplinary design optimization procedure increased accessible altitude (performance index) of the referred sounding rocket by twenty five percents and the second one twenty nine.
机构地区 MDO Laboratory
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2007年第1期86-96,共11页 中国航空学报(英文版)
关键词 multidisciplinary design optimization sounding rocket central composite design response surface method equation of motion of a rocket multidisciplinary design optimization sounding rocket central composite design response surface method equation of motion of a rocket
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Hammond W E.Space transportation:a system approach to analysis and design.AIAA Education Series,1999.
  • 2Hammond W E.Design methodology for space transportation system.AIAA Education Series,2001.
  • 3Simpson T W.Approaches to multidisciplinary design optimization.3rd Simulation Based Acquisition Conference.California,2001.
  • 4Cormier T,Scott A,Ledsinger L,et al.Comparison of collaborative optimization to conventional design techniques for a conceptual RLV.AIAA-4885,2000.
  • 5Kroo M,Braun R D,Modre A A.Use of collaborative optimization architecture for launch vehicle design.6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization.Bellevue,Washington,1996.
  • 6Tsuchiya T,Mori T.Multidisciplinary design optimization to future space transportation vehicles.AIAA-5171,2002.
  • 7Tartabini P V,Lepsch R A,Korte J J,et al.A mulfidisciplinary performance analysis of a lifting-body single-stage-to-orbit vehicle.AIAA 2000-1045,2000.
  • 8Stanley D O,Engelund W C,Wihute A C,et al,A comparison of single-stage and two-stage airheating launch vehicles at high mach number.Journal of spacecraft and rockets 1992;29(5):735-740.
  • 9Stanely D O,Engelund W C,Lepsch R A,et al.Rocket-powered single-stage vehicle configuration selection and design.Journal of spacecraft and rockets 1994,31(5):792-798.
  • 10Talay T A,Marris W D.Advanced manned launch systems.Proceeding of the 2nd European Aerospace Conference on Progress in Space Transportation.1989.

同被引文献79

引证文献7

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部