期刊文献+

早产儿机械通气撤机后应用鼻塞持续气道正压通气对呼吸支持的评估 被引量:3

Evaluation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after ventilator weaning.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨鼻塞持续气道正压通气(nasal continuous positive airway pressure,NCPAP)在防止早产儿撤离经气管插管机械通气时撤机失败的作用。【方法】将48例体重<2 000 g,胎龄≤32周,进行经气管插管机械通气的早产儿在撤机后随机分成NCPAP组(24例)及经头罩给氧组(24例)。撤机72 h病情稳定视为撤机成功。比较两组的撤机成功率。【结果】撤机后NCPAP组19例一次撤机成功(79.2%),直接头罩给氧组一次成功仅10例(41.7%),两组间差异具有显著性(P<0.01)。两组间出现腹胀、喂养不耐受情况,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。撤机失败的主要原因经头罩给氧组是呼吸暂停,PaCO2升高和FiO2升高,而NCPAP组则为PaCO2升高和FiO2升高。【结论】早产儿撤离经气管插管机械通气后立即使用NCPAP支持呼吸,可明显提高一次撤机成功率。 [Objective] To determine whether nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) prevents extubation failure in premature infants. [Methods] Forty-eight premature infants,(〈2 000 g birth weight and ≤32 weeks gestation) who were beeing mechanically ventilated were enrolled in the study. The infants were randomized at extubation to either NCPAP or O2 via head box(24 per group). Extubation success or failure was defined as reintubation within 72 hours of extubation. The success rates were compared between the two groups. Objective criteria for failure of extubation were as follow: a PaCO2 〉70mmHg; FiO2 〉0.7 ;or severe recurrent apnea (〉2 apnea requiring intermittent positive pressure ventilation in 24 hours or 〉6 apnea per day). [Results] The NCPAP group had a higher incidence of extubation success (19/24) compared with head box group(10/24). There was no increase in the incidence of abdominal distensionor feeding intolerance. In head box group, extubation failed because of severe apnea, elevated PaCO2 and FiO2. Failed because of elevated PaCO2 and FiO2 in NCPAP group, [Conelusion] NCPAP immediately after extubation is effective in preventing extubation failure and can increase the success rate of ventilator weaning in premature infants.
出处 《中国儿童保健杂志》 CAS 2007年第3期298-299,共2页 Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
关键词 早产儿 撤机 呼吸支持 鼻塞持续气道正压通气 premature infant weaning respiratory support nasal continuous positive airway pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1吴家骅.渗透压性脱髓鞘综合征[J].中华儿科杂志,1989,27(2):119-120. 被引量:6
  • 2刘红.新生儿撤离呼吸器失败的原因探讨[J].新生儿科杂志,1996,11(1):7-9. 被引量:4
  • 3[3]Rehan VK, Laiprasert J, Nakashima JM, et al. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on diaphragm dimensions in preterm infants. J Perinatol, 2001, 21:521.
  • 4[4]Klausner JF, Lee AY, Hutchison AA. Decreased imposed work with a new nasal continuous positive airway pressure device.Pediatr Pulmonal, 1996,22(1):188.
  • 5Venkataraman ST. Weaning and extubation in infants and children:religion, art, or science. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2002, 3 (2):203-205.
  • 6Venkataraman ST, Khan N, Brown A . Validation of predictors of extubation success and failure in mechanically ventilated infants and children. Crit Care Med, 2000,28(8) :2991-2996.
  • 7Kurachek SC,Newth CJ,Quasney, MW, et al. Extubation failure in pediatric intensive care: A multiple-center study of risk factors and outcomes. Criti Care Med ,2003,31 ( 11 ) : 2657-2664.
  • 8Balsan M J, jones JG, Watchko JF,et al. Measurements of pulmonary mechanics prior to the elective extubation of neonates. Pediatr Pulmonol, 1990,9:238 -243.
  • 9Veness-Meehan KA, Richter S, Davis JM. Pulmonary function testing prior to extubation in infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol, 1990:92-96.
  • 10Rothaar RE, Epstein SIC Extubation failure: magnitude of the problem, impact on outcomes, and prevention. Curt Opin Crit Care,2003, 9(1) :59-66.

共引文献102

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部