期刊文献+

煤气管道的震害率分析 被引量:13

Analysis of earthquake damage ratio of buried gas pipe
下载PDF
导出
摘要 埋地管道的地震危险性分析方法可以分为理论分析法和经验统计法。震害率是经验统计法中常用的一个概念。埋地管道在地震中破坏的主要原因是地面运动和场地土液化等引起的场地土失效,另外管线的接口类型、管材、管径等也是决定其震害的因素。在查阅相关文献的基础上,对埋地管道的震害率分析方法进行了综述,并运用经验统计法提出了便于使用的煤气管道震害率估算表达式。 The analysis methods of earthquake risk of buried pipeline could be divided into theoretical approach and empirical approach. Earthquake damage ratio is a usually used concept in empirical approach. The main factors that lead to damage to buried pipe in earthquakes are earthquake ground motions (wave propagations) and ground failure induced by liquefaction etc. In addition, there are other factors--such as joint, material, diameter of pipe and so on. In this paper, analysis methods of earthquake damage ratio of buried pipe are summarized, and damage ratio of gas pipe is put forward based on empirical approach.
出处 《自然灾害学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期148-153,共6页 Journal of Natural Disasters
基金 "十五"国家科技攻关项目(2001BA601B-04-01-02)
关键词 埋地管道 煤气管道 震害率 buried pipe gas pipe earthquake damage ratio rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Chen W W,Shin B J,Chen Y C,et al.Seismic response of natural gas and water pipelines in the Ji-Ji earthquake[ J ].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2002,22 (12):1209-1214.
  • 2Shimazu T,Shimazu N,Shimazu H.Regional assessment of Earthquake Hazard(Part2 Lifeline and Transpertation)[ C ]//Earthquake Engineering.USA,ASCE,2003:819-828.
  • 3艾晓秋,李杰.地下管线的有效应力地震反应分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2005,25(1):1-7. 被引量:12
  • 4Ogawa Y,Koike T.Structural design of buried pipelines for severe earthquake[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2001,21 (3):199 -209.
  • 5刘威,李杰,卫书麟,周静海.供气管线抗震可靠性分析[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2005,27(6):94-96. 被引量:10
  • 6裴宗厂,刘尧兴,王晓青,刘鹏.埋地管道震害预测方法简述[J].西北地震学报,2005,27(2):186-189. 被引量:8
  • 7Bresko D,Hendrickson C,Oppenheim I.Seismic Risk Analysis of an Urban Water System[ C ]//Lifeline Earthquake Engineering,the Current State of Knowledge.New York:ASCE,1981:241-256.
  • 8王东炜.地下管线震害预测初探[J].郑州工学院学报,1991,12(1):65-68. 被引量:11
  • 9朱美珍.给水管网的震害预测及可靠性评价[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),1994,22(4):463-468. 被引量:6
  • 10Eidinger J.Seismic Fragility Formulations for Water Systems[ M].USA:G&E Repert 47.01.01,2001.

二级参考文献24

  • 1屈铁军,王前信.地下管线多点地震激励纵向振动的级数解[J].地震工程与工程振动,1993,13(4):39-46. 被引量:21
  • 2麻水岐,王小军,王锋.管道系统综合概率震害预测方法[J].灾害学,1993,8(2):33-37. 被引量:3
  • 3梁建文.地下管线地震反应和稳定性研究述评[J].天津大学学报,1996,29(3):427-434. 被引量:6
  • 4匿名著者,1979年
  • 5M.D. Trifunac, M. I. Todorovska. Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994: density of Pipe breakes and surface strains[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1997, (16): 193-207.
  • 6W.W. Chen, B. Shih, Y. C. Chen, et al. Seismic response of natural gas and water pipelines in the Ji-Ji earthquake [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, (22): 1209-1214.
  • 7T. Ariman, G. E. Muleski. A review of the response of buried pipelines under seismic excitations[J]. International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 1981, (9): 133-151.
  • 8T.K. Datta. Seismic response of buried pipelines: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1999,(192): 271-284.
  • 9H.B. Seed, I. M. Idriss. Pore-water pressure change during soil liquefaction[J]. Journal of Geotechnical &Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 1976, 102(4): 323-346.
  • 10D.S. Liyanapathirana, H. G.. Poulos. Numerical simulation of soil liquefaction due to earthquake loading[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake engineering,2002, (22): 511-523.

共引文献40

同被引文献120

引证文献13

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部