期刊文献+

英语DOC和DC构式的认知语言学分析 被引量:6

A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to the English DOC and DC Constructions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 句法结构反映人的概念结构和对世界的识解方式。包含相同概念内容的句式也会因为对事件的识解方式不同而导致意义上的差别。英语双及物结构的两个典型构式,双宾构式(DOC)和与格构式(DC)不是衍推和转换的同义关系,而是体现了认知和意义的不同。本文首先分析了英语三价动词这一范畴的典型特征,继而探讨了DOC和DC的构式义及其成因,分析了这两个构式的差异以及造成这些差异的原因,最后分析了这两种构式如何通过隐喻和转喻的延伸形成SVNX和SVN2XN1的构式范畴。 The syntax of an expression reflects conceptual structures and the way people construe the world. Syntactic constructions containing the same conceptualcontents may differ in meaning due to the different construals employed to structure the conceived scenes. The English double object construction (DOC) and dative construction (DC), are not of the relations of derivation or transformation, but rather differ in cognition and meaning. This paper will first explore the prototypical features of the English ditransitive verbs, and then elaborate the constructional meanings and the differences between DOC and DC, and then account for their restrictions and underlying causes, and finally their metaphorical and metonymical extensions.
作者 莫启扬 文旭
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期6-11,共6页 Foreign Language Education
基金 教育部社科项目(项目号:06JA740037) 西南大学青年社科基金的资助
关键词 DOC构式 DC构式 识解 隐喻 转喻 double object construction dative construction construal metaphor metonymy
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Aoun, J.& Y-H. A. Li. Scope and eonstitueney[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1989(20) : 141-172.
  • 2Baker, M.C. Object sharing and projection in serial verb construction[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1989(20) :513-553.
  • 3Bolinger, D. Aspects of Language [M]. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1968.
  • 4Chomsky, N. Reflections on Language [M]. New York: Pantheon, 1975.
  • 5Cooper, W. E.&J. R. Ross. Word order[A]. In Grossman, R.E. et al. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism[C]. Chicago : Chicago Linguistic Society, 1975.
  • 6Croft, W.& D. A. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.
  • 7DeLancey, S. An interpretation of split ergativity and related matters[J]. Language, 1981,57(3) : 626-657.
  • 8Dixon, R. A New Approach to English Grammar:on Semantic Priciples[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
  • 9Goldberg, A.E. The inherent semantics of argument structure: The ease of the English ditransitive construction[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1992,3(1) : 37-74.
  • 10Goldberg, A.E. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago: The University of Chieago Press, 1995.

二级参考文献87

共引文献822

同被引文献105

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部