期刊文献+

决策中个体差异研究现状述评 被引量:24

The Individual Differences Research in Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 决策中个体差异的研究有助于进一步检验和深化传统决策理论。文章回顾了近十年决策个体差异研究的主要变量(人格、认知能力、认知风格和年龄)和研究结果,并简要总结了该类研究的背景、研究范式和理论意义。这些研究一致发现个体差异变量对决策过程、决策表现等具有影响作用,说明个体差异与决策加工中复杂的人-情境间联系有关。文章提出,未来研究应该综合考虑决策情境、情绪和决策主体的理论模型,以期对个体差异在决策中的作用做出更好解释。 The individual differences research in decision making (IDRD) can help to re-test and deepen traditional decision making models. The paper introduced the main researching variables (personality, cognitive ability, cognition styles and age) and results of the IDRD in recent 10 years, and summarized the background, research methods and theory meaning of IDRD briefly. These researches consistently found the influence of these variables on decision making process and performance, which indicated that individual differences were related to the complex person-context links in decision making process. To explain the influences of individual differences on decision making better, an integrate model needs to be developed in the future, in which the decision making context, emotion and person are considered together.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期689-694,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 个体差异 决策研究 个体差异法 决策理论. individual differences, decision making research, individual difference methods, decision making models.
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Lauriola M, Levin I P. Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: an exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 31:215-226
  • 2Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econornetrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-292
  • 3Soane E, Chmiel N. Are risk preferences consistent? The influence of decision domain and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, 38:1781-1791
  • 4Moore S R, Smith R E, Gonzalez R. Personality and judgment heuristics: contextual and individual difference interactions in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997, 23(1): 76-83
  • 5Kowert P A, Hermann M Co. Who takes risks? Daring and caution in foreign policy making. Journal of conflict Resolution, 1997, 41(5): 611-637
  • 6Nicholson N, Soane E, Fenton-O'Creevy M, et al. Domain specific risk taking and personality. Journal of Risk Research, 2005, 8(2): 157-176
  • 7Levin I P, Gaeth G J, Schreiber J, et al. A new look at framing effects: distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002, 88(1): 411-429
  • 8Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76(2): 149-188
  • 9Le Pine J A, Colquitt J A, Erez A. Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 2000, 53(3): 563-593
  • 10Cooper M L, Agocha V B, Sheldon M S. A motivational perspective on risk behaviors: the role of personality and affect regulatory processes.Journal of Personality, 2000, 68(6): 1059-1088

同被引文献552

引证文献24

二级引证文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部