期刊文献+

丙泊酚氯胺酮利多卡因合剂静脉注射用于肠镜检查35例观察 被引量:1

Effects of propofol, ketamine and lidocaine mixture on enteroscopy:report of 35 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察丙泊酚、氨胺酮、利多卡因(PKL)合剂用于肠镜检查的临床效果。方法70例需行肠镜检查的患者分为两组,P组丙泊酚用量为3 mg/kg;PKL组以丙泊酚用量计算,为0.6 mg/kg。比较两组的镇痛效果、丙泊酚的用量、对呼吸及循环的影响和苏醒时间的差异。结果PKL组镇痛效果强于P组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);PKL组的丙泊酚用量明显少于P组(P<0.05),且苏醒时间明显短于P组(P<0.05);PKL组的BP、HR与P组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),诱导5 min内SpO2降低较P组明显(P<0.05)。结论PKL用于肠镜检查,镇静镇痛效果好,丙泊酚的用量明显减少,苏醒时间缩短,对循环有支持作用。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of intravenous propofol, ketamine and lidocaine mixture (PKL) on enteroscopy. Methods Seventy cases undergoing enteroscopy were divided into two groups, P group and PKL group. The propofol dose in P group and PKL group was 3 mg/kg, and 0.6 mg/kg respectively. The analgesic effects,the dose of propofol ,the effect on respiration and circulation, and the time of palinestbesia in the two groups were compared. Results The analgesic effect in the PKL group was significantly better than that in P group( P 〈0.05 ). Propofol dose was significantly lower than that in P group ( P 〈0.05 ), and the time of palinestbesia was significantly shorter than that in P group ( P 〈0.05 ). BP and HR were more stable but SpO2 was lower within 5 rain during induction in PKL group compared with P group ( P 〈0.05 ). Conclusion Using PKL in enteroscopy has several advantages, such as better analgesic effect,lower dose of propofol, shorter time of palinesthesia and supporting effect to circulation.
出处 《实用疼痛学杂志》 2007年第3期201-203,共3页 Pain Clinic Journal
关键词 二异丙酚 氯胺酮 利多卡因 肠镜检查 镇痛 Propofol Ketamine Lidocaine Enteroscopy Analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1郑清民,李师阳,肖全胜,姚伟瑜,房小斌.雷米芬太尼和丙泊酚复合麻醉用于人工流产的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(1):64-64. 被引量:22
  • 2Stewart JT,Warren FW,Maddox FC,et al.The stability of remifentanil hydrochloride and propofol in polypropylene syringes and polyvinylchloride bags at 22-24℃.Anesth Analg,2000,90:1450-1451.
  • 3Hindmarch I.Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs.Br J Clin Pharmacol,1980,10:189-209.
  • 4Joo HS,Perks WJ,Kataoka MT,et al.A comparison of patient-controlled sedation using either remifentanil or remifentanilpropofol for shock wave lithotripsy.Anesth Analg,2001,93:1227-1232.
  • 5Davis PJ,Finkel JC,Orr RJ,et al.A randomized,double-blinded study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients.Anesth Analg,2000,90:863-871.
  • 6Fukushima M, Matsumoto N. Effects of propofol infusion on respiration,systemic circulation and regional organ blood flow. Masui, 1999, 48:1105-1112.
  • 7Haber JP, Audibert G, Saunier CG, et al. Effect of propofol and thiopentone on regional blood flow in brain and periperal tissues during normoxia and hypoxia in the dog. Clin Physiol, 1998,13:197-207.
  • 8Frederick JC, Mark WC, Naiyar K, et sl. Effect of propofol infusion on splanchnic hemodynamics and liver oxygen consumption in the rat.Anesthesiology, 1993, 79:1051-1060.
  • 9Krassioukov AV, Gelb AW, Weaver LC, et al. Action of propofol on central sympathetic mechanisms controlling blood pressure. Can J Anaesth, 1993,40:761-769.
  • 10Xuan YT, Zhang J, Glass PSA. Propofol regulation of calcium entry pathways in cultured A10 and rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Br Parmacol, 1996,117:5-8.

共引文献62

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部