摘要
法律裁判并非仅仅通过推理即可形成。法律推理其实是为判决结论提供正当理由的过程,可是推理本身是无法为自身的"前提"提供出处的。这就需要将裁判思维的视野扩大到推理"前提"的获得以及获得之前的心理活动上。如果将前提的获得称为发现,将结论是否合理的证明过程称为证成,那么裁判思维就可以被分成"发现"与"证成"两个脉络。
Legal decisions are not made through reasoning only. Legal reasoning is a process to provide due course for judicial decisions, but reasoning itself cannot provide it own premise. It is necessary to expand the views of decision thoughts to obtaining of "premise" of reasoning and the psychological activities before its acquirement. If we name the acquirement of the premise as "discovery", and name the procedure of proof the reasonability of the decision as "testify", the thought of decision is just divided into "discovery" and "testify".
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期11-19,共9页
Law and Social Development
关键词
法律裁判
裁判思维
法律论证
法律发现
legal decision
thought of decision
legal reasoning
legal discovery