期刊文献+

典型人因可靠性分析方法评述 被引量:51

An Overview of Typical Methods for Human Reliability Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对比较典型的第一代和第二代人因可靠性分析方法进行综述。首先讨论人因可靠性的基本定义;然后选取几种比较有代表意义的第一代方法进行对比分析,以此为基础介绍第一代方法的基本思想和特征;接下来分析第二代人因可靠性分析方法中两种典型方法,讨论它们的基本特点,并分析它们相对于第一代人因可靠性分析方法的优势以及自身的一些问题;最后展望人因可靠性分析方法的发展趋势。 Some typical methods for human reliability analysis are surveyed. Firstly, the definition of human reliability is discussed. Secondly, several typical methods are chosen from the in'st generation methods for comparison and review. Their basic characters and limitations are discussed. Thirdly, two typical methods of the second generation are analyzed in detail. The comparison between the above and the preceding methods is carried out while their advantages and drawbacks are presented. Finally, further research suggestion is proposed.
出处 《国防科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期101-107,共7页 Journal of National University of Defense Technology
基金 国家部委基金资助项目(51404010105KG0121) 国家部委资助项目(51319040201)
关键词 人因可靠性分析 HRA方法 性能形成因子 认知模型 事件树 Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) HRA method Performance Shaping Factor (PSF) cognitive model event tree
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Williams H L.Reliability Evaluation of the Human Component in Man-machine Systems[J].Electrical Engineering,April 1958:78-82.
  • 2Shapero A,Cooper J I,Rappaport M,et al.Human Engineering Testing and Malfunction Data Collection in Weapon System Program[R].Report WADD Technical Report 60-36,Wright Air Development Division,Wright-Patterson AFB,OH,1960.
  • 3Meister D.A Critical Review of Human Performance Reliability Predictive Methods[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,1973,22(3):116-123.
  • 4Swain A D,Guttmann H E.Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278)[R].Washington,DC:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1983.
  • 5Embrey D E.SLIM-MAUD:An Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilities Using Structured Expert Judgment (NUREG/CR-3518)[R].Washington,DC:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1984.
  • 6Hanaman G W.Spurgin A J,Lukic Y.Human Cognitive Reliability model for PRA analysis (NUS-4531)[R].Draft EPRI Report,Electric Power Research Institute,1984.
  • 7Williams J C.A Data-based Method for Assessing and Reducing Human Error to Improve Operational Performance[C]//Proc.IEEE 4th Human Factor and Power Plants,1988:436-453.
  • 8Hollnagel E.Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)[M].Elsevier Science Ltd,1998.
  • 9Dougherty E M.Human Reliability analysis-where shouldst thou turn?[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1990,27(3):283-299.
  • 10高佳,黄祥瑞,沈祖培.第二代人的可靠性分析方法的新进展[J].中南工学院学报,1999,13(2):138-149. 被引量:17

二级参考文献36

  • 1张力 黄曙东 黄祥瑞 等.岭澳核电站人因可靠性分析[M].北京:原子能出版社,2001..
  • 2Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of Human-Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications[S], 1983, NUREG/CR-1278.
  • 3Hannaman G W. Human Cognitive Reliability Model forPRA Analysis[R], 1984, NUS-4531.
  • 4Liu Yili,Int J Man-Machine Studies,1993年,39卷,1015页
  • 5王武宏,汽车运输研究,1993年,12页
  • 6何水清,结构可靠性分析与设计,1993年
  • 7戴光亚,航空学报,1992年,13卷
  • 8任福田,交通工程,1992年,2期
  • 9疏松桂,控制系统可靠性分析与综合,1992年,270页
  • 10金磊,甘肃科学学报,1991年

共引文献47

同被引文献437

引证文献51

二级引证文献243

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部