期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

美国保险法中惩罚性赔偿责任可保性研究 被引量：2

The Insurability of Punitive Damages in American Insurance Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在美国保险法中,惩罚性赔偿责任究竟是否具有可保性是一个备受争议的问题。解决该问题的方法是根据惩罚性赔偿责任的具体形态并结合具体案件来判断,进而决定能否将惩罚性赔偿责任纳入保险合同的承保范围。 In American insurance law, the insurability of punitive damages is a controversial problem. The way to solve this problem is to decide the case according to the material form of punitive damages, and further to decide whether the coverage of insurance includes punitive damages.
作者 孙宏涛 曹智
机构地区 上海交通大学 广州大学
出处 《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》 2007年第2期54-58,共5页 Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
关键词 惩罚性赔偿 可保性 承保范围 公共政策 punitive damages insurability coverage of insurance public policy
分类号 D923.8 [政治法律—民商法学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1王利明.惩罚性赔偿研究[J].中国社会科学,2000(4):112-122. 被引量：845
  • 2[2]Katherine B.Posner.Coverage For Punitive Damages:Choice Of Law "Shell Game"[J].International Insurance Law Review,1993,(01):404-405.
  • 3[3]William P.Zuger.Insurance Coverage of Punitive Damages[J].North Dakota Law Review,1976,(53):257-258.
  • 4[4][12]Roginsky v.Richardson-Merrell,Inc.,378 F.2d 832,841(2d Cir.1967).1033-1035.
  • 5[5][8][20][26]Alan I.Widiss.Liability insurance coverage for punitive damages? Discerning answers to the conundrum created by disputes involving conflicting public policies,pragmatic considerations and political actions[J].Villanova Law Review,1994,(39):478.482-484.477.490-492.
  • 6[6]American Home Ins.Assurance Co.v.Safeway Steel Prod.,743 S.W.2d 693,705 (Tex.Ct.App.1987).
  • 7[7]Grace M.Giesel.The Knowledge Of Insurers And The Posture Of The Parties In The Determination Of The Insurability Of Punitive Damages[J].University of Kansas Law Review,1991,(39):378.
  • 8[9]Dorsey D.Ellis,Jr.Fairness And Efficiency In The Law Of Punitive Damages[J].Southern California Law Review,1982,(56):25-28.
  • 9[10]See Harrell v.Travelers Indem.Co.,567 P.2d 1013,1024 (Oregon.1977)
  • 10[11]Tom Baker.Reconsidering Insurance For Punitive Damages[J].Wisconsin Law Review,1998:103-104.

二级参考文献66

  • 1[美]约翰·亨利·梅利曼 顾培东 禄正平译.《大陆法系》[M].法律出版社,2004年版.第87页．第44页.
  • 2See Scott B. Krider, The Rtmastruxction of Insurance Contracts Under the Doctrine of Reascoable Expectations,18J. MARSHALL. REV. 155(1984).
  • 3Delancy v. Rockingham Farmers Mutual Insurance Co, 52 N.H. 581,587(1913).
  • 4Bowler v .Fidelity and Contyact and Choice of New York, 53 N.J.313,250 A. 2d 580 (1969).
  • 5Abranham, Freedom Contract and Coice of Law in Insurance, 93 Harvard Law Review 1981, p. 109.
  • 6Stephen J. Ware,A Critique of the Returnable Expectations Doctrine ,56 University of Chicago Law Review 1461,1463-1475(Fall 1989), p.267, p.296.
  • 7Mark C. Rahdert, Reasonable Expectations Reconsidered,18 Connecticut Law Review 323, 334 (1986).
  • 8Aiu ins co v fmc corp ,247 calrptr 820, 831 (1990).
  • 9Abrahams v. Medkerranean Ins & Reins Co Ltd (1991) 1 LIoyd's Rep,p. 114.
  • 10Youell v. Blard Wdch & Co Ltd(1992) 2 Loyd's Rep p. 127.

共引文献904

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）
2007年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部