摘要
探讨脑胶质瘤放疗靶区的确定方法。方法:9例脑胶质瘤患者用核磁共振(magneticreso-nance,MR)勾画靶区,然后通过软件分别与计算机断层扫描(computed tomography,CT)图像融合,把在MR所勾画的肿瘤区(gross tumor volume,GTV)及水肿区覆盖在CT图像上,通过CT图像的电子密度来计算吸收剂量并设照射野。结果:通过CT与MR在勾画靶区上的不同体积比较,MR上勾画靶区体积往往大于在CT上勾画靶区体积,GTV平均增大18.1%,水肿区平均增大29.0%,计划靶区(planning target volume,PTV)平均增大40.1%,并可更清晰地区分GTV与水肿区。结论:初步研究结果提示,在脑胶质瘤靶区确定方面,MR有着CT无可比拟的优势。对于脑胶质瘤Ⅲ及Ⅳ级,水肿区为亚临床病灶(clinical target volume,CTV),而对于脑胶质瘤Ⅱ级,水肿区为GTV。
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to research the delineation of GTV-CTV for gliomas. METHODS:CT simulation and MR were obtained from 9 patients. By using CT and MR CT/MR was fused to contour GTV and the area edematous, and by the images of CT, the doses were caculated. RESULTS: Comparison of the tumor volumes and the area edematous in CT-based and MR-based, the volumes of MR-based were greater than those of CT-based, and GTV increased about 18.1%, the area edematous increased about 29%, and PTV increased about 40. 1%, and the images of MR-based were more precise for the delineation of GTV-CTV than those of CT-based, and the same for the area edematous. CONCLUSIONS: The images of MR have an advantage over those of CT for gliomas. For the gliomas Ⅲ or Ⅳ grade, the area edematous is CTV, but for the gliomas Ⅱ, the area edematous is GTV.
出处
《中华肿瘤防治杂志》
CAS
2007年第13期997-999,共3页
Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment