摘要
目的比较放、化疗序贯与同步治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效。方法选择NSCLC患者100例随机进行放、化疗同步治疗组和化、放疗序贯治疗组。同步组于放疗开始的1周、4周、8周、12周给予化疗,序贯组在4个周期的化疗结束后给予放射治疗,2组病例均给予常规放疗。结果同步组和序贯组的近期疗效有效率分别为82%和64%;1 a、3 a、5 a生存率、中位生存期分别为76%、32%、15.7%(28个月)和62%、22%、9.9%(18.6个月),两组差异有显著性(2χ=4.373,P<0.05)。两组患者的毒副反应主要为可逆性骨髓抑制、放射性食管炎和放射性肺炎,两组发生率相似。结论放、化疗同步治疗MSCLC效果好于化、放疗的序贯治疗。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of sequential and concurrent therapy for middle and advanced stage non-small cell lung carcinoma(NSCLC). Methods One hundred patients with non-small cell lung cancer were randomized into two groups:concurrent radiochemotherapy group (group C)and sequential radiochemotherapy group(group S). All patients in the two groups were treated with conventional radiotherapy. Patients in group C received concurrent chemotherapy in the first, fourth, eighth, twelfth week. Patients in group S received four cycles of sequential chemotherapy before radiotherapy. Results The response rate was 82% in group C and 64% in group S. The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates and median survival time were 76% , 32% , 15.7% and 28 months in group C ,while 62% , 22% , 9.9% and 18.6 months in group S respectively, with significant difference. The toxicity in the two groups had no significant differece. Conclusion The concurrent chemo-mdiotherapy has better overall response than the sequential chemo-radiotherapy. So it is a better method for the treatment of middle and advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer.
出处
《河南职工医学院学报》
2007年第1期11-13,共3页
Journal of Henan Medical College For Staff and Workers
关键词
非小细胞肺癌
放射疗法
药物治疗
non-small cell lung cancer
radiotherapy
chcmothcropy
sequential therapy
concurrent therapy