摘要
目前大多数学者将大陆法系的一事不再理原则与英美法系的禁止双重危险原则予以等同的研究,这有待于进一步推敲。一事不再理原则以既判力为理论基础,英美法系的禁止双重危险原则以人权保障为理论基础,理论基础上的差异导致了二者在制度设计上呈现出巨大反差。我们应该选择大陆法系的一事不再理原则为立法模式,重新设计刑事再审程序。
The principle of Non bis in Idem in Civil Law and the principle of forbidding double Jeopardy in Common Law have different studying premise and conclusion. The principle of Non bis in Idem and the pinciple of prohibiting duplicated prosecution take the Res judicata and human rights protection as their theoretical basis respectively. Two different theoretical basis result in quite distinct system design. It is suggested that China should choose the principle of Non bis in Idem as the theoretical basis and redesign the criminal retrial procedure.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期141-151,共11页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社会科学规划基金资助项目(06CFX026)
关键词
既判力
一事不再理
禁止双重危险
再审
res judicata
non bis in Idem
forbidding double jeopardy
retrial