摘要
运用文献研究中常用的比较法,通过与《太素》、《甲乙经》等相关资料的比较研究,似可认为,王冰次注《素问》与《太素》、《甲乙经》等的差异:主要当系祖本不同所致,不得尽归罪于王冰,王冰改动经文当不会太多。
Through comparative study of 'Taisu', A-B Classic of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, and some related materials by using frequently comparative method in literature study. It may be considered that the different versions were the main causes for resulting in the difference between 'Plain Questions' annotated by Wang Bing and 'Taisu', and A-B Classic of Acupuncture and Moxibustion. So the changes of 'Plain Questions' can't impute to Wang Bing who didn't change too many of the content.
出处
《中国医药学报》
CSCD
1997年第1期24-28,共5页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy