期刊文献+

两种植骨材料促进即刻种植体周骨组织再生效果比较 被引量:9

Comparison of Impact of Two Bone Substitutes on Promoting Bone Regeneration around Fresh Extraction Socket Implant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】比较两种植骨材料PepGen P15 Flow(简称P15)和Bio-Oss引导即刻种植体周骨组织再生能力及骨-种植体结合能力。【方法】将beagle犬下颌单侧双尖牙全部拔除,然后在新鲜拔牙窝内植入种植体3颗。植入后于种植体颊侧制备标准骨缺损并作如下处置:A组空置,B组植入P15,C组植入Bio-Oss;覆盖Bio-Gide,初期缝合伤口。于术后第6周、12周将beagle犬分期处死获取标本,进行大体、影像学、组织学观测。【结果】B、C组植骨区外形均较A组膨隆,尤其是C组。X线观察可见B、C组X线阻射影几乎覆盖整个植骨区,而A组的X线阻射影仅局限于骨缺损周边区域。组织学检查发现:植骨区范围内的新生骨比例和骨-种植体结合率B组最高,C组其次,A组最低;未降解的植骨材料比例B组低于C组;植骨材料-新生骨结合率B组高于C组。【结论】与Bio-Gide联合应用,P15与Bio-Oss均能有效促进即刻种植体周骨组织再生数量与质量,且能促进骨-种植体结合率,前者较有利于促进植骨区新生骨改建成熟,而后者较有利于保障植骨区体积稳定性。 [Objective] To compare the impact of two bone substitutes (PepGen P15 Flow and Bio-Oss) on promoting bone regeneration around fresh extraction socket implant and bone-to-implant contact. [Methods] All the beagle dogs' mandibular bicuspids of one side were extracted and then three implants were inserted into the fresh extraction sockets. Standard bone defects were prepared on the buccal side of the implants and then filled with blank (group A), P15 (group B), and Bio-Oss (group C), respectively. After the application of bone substitutes the wound was covered with membrane Bio-Gide and the elevated gingival flap was then sutured to form primary closure. At 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively the dogs were sacrificed for clinical check, radiology, and histological analysis. [Results] In the socket areas, group C rather than group B shaped much more bulge than group A. Radiographic analysis demonstrated there was obvious shade area around the neck of the implant in group A, but no signs of shade area in group B and C. Histological analysis showed: the percentage area of new bone formation and bone-to- implant contact ratio, B〉C〉A; and the percentage of residual bone substitute, B〈 C; and the percentage contact length between new born bone and residual bone substitute, B 〉C. [Conclusion] In combination with membrane Bio-Gide, both bone substitutes P15 and Bio-Oss can effectively promote bone regeneration around immediate extraction socket implant and also the bone-to-implant contact ratio. P15 is more suitable to rebuild and mature the new born bone, while Bio-Oss to maintain the volume of bone grafted area.
出处 《中山大学学报(医学科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期470-472,共3页 Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University:Medical Sciences
基金 广东省自然科学基金资助项目(04009431)
关键词 即刻种植 植骨材料 引导骨组织再生 immediate implant implant bone substitute guided bone regeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1HOLE B B,SCHWARZ J A,GILBERT J L,et al.A study of biologically active peptide sequences (P-15) on the surface of an ABM scaffold (PepGen P-15TM) using AFM and FTIR[J].J Biomed Mater Res A,2005,74(4):712-721.
  • 2VALENTIN A H,WEBER J.Receptor technology-cell binding to P-15:a new method of regenerating bone quickly and safely-preliminary histomorphometrical and mechanical results in sinus floor augmentations[J].Keio J Med,2004,53(3):166-171.
  • 3罗智斌,丁学强,邓飞龙,陈宇,朱李军.低弹性模量纯钛种植体的骨内植入试验研究[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2003,24(2):126-128. 被引量:8
  • 4BOTTICELLI D,BERGLUNDH T,LINDHE J.The influence of a biomaterial on the closure of a marginal hard tissue defect adjacent to implants:An experimental study in the dog[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2004,15(3):285-292.
  • 5SCHLEGEL K A,FICHNER G,SCHULTZE-MOSGAU S,et al.Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2003,18(1):53-58.
  • 6耿威,宿玉成,徐刚,林润台.Bio-oss结合Bio-gide修复牙种植体周围骨缺损的组织学研究[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(1):4-7. 被引量:23

二级参考文献12

  • 1耿威,宿玉成,徐刚,林润台.无机牛骨结合可吸收性胶原膜修复种植牙骨缺损的定量分析[J].口腔医学研究,2004,20(3):229-229. 被引量:3
  • 2Spector M. Anorganic bovine bone and ceramic analogs of bone mineral as implants to facilitate bone regeneration [J]. Clin Plast Surg, 1994, 21:437-444.
  • 3Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-oss. An experimental study in the dog [J].Clin Oral Impl Res, 1997, 8:117-124.
  • 4Mcallister BS, Margolin MD, Cogan AG, et al. Eighteen-month radiographic and histologic evaluation of sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone in the chimpanzee[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1999, 14:361-368.
  • 5Kay SA, Wisner Lynch L, Marxer M, et al. Integration of a resorbable membrane and a bone graft material [J]. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, 1997, 9:185-194.
  • 6Zitzman NU, Naef R, Scharer MS.Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1997, 12:844-852.
  • 7Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Keil C, et al. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts [J]. Int J OralMaxillofac implants,1998,13:639-646.
  • 8Peetz M. Characterization Of Xenogeneic Bone Material. In Boyne PJ , eds.Osseous Recontruction of the Maxilla and the Mandible. 1st ed [M].Quintessence Publishing: Gemany,1997,87-100.
  • 9张杰魁,陈治清.人体硬组织替换材料弹性模量变化对种植界面力学状态的影响——三维各向异性有限元分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1998,16(3):274-278. 被引量:15
  • 10滕伟,米乃元,李彦,郑岳华.碳纤维增强碳及其与羟基磷灰石复合种植体骨界面[J].中山医科大学学报,1999,20(1):42-44. 被引量:6

共引文献29

同被引文献124

引证文献9

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部