对冲基金已成超级“肇事者” 美国能否收紧监管大网?
被引量:1
摘要
曾是全球金融市场呼风唤雨的超级"造市者",如今却因种种丑闻而更像金融市场的超级"肇事者";如何对急剧膨胀的对冲基金加强监管,SEC再次面临重大挑战。
出处
《中国经济周刊》
2007年第28期44-45,共2页
China Economic Weekly
同被引文献14
-
1Tamar Frankel. Private Investment Funds: Hedge Funds'Regulation by Size, 39 Rutgers L. J. , 2008, p. 657,p. 661.
-
2William A. Roach. Hedge Fund Regulation: What Side of the Hedges are you on?, University of Memphis Law Review, Fall, 2009, p. 179.
-
3Thierry Olivier Desmet. Understanding Hedge Fund Adviser Regulation, 4 Hastings Bus. L. J. 1, 15 (2008) ,pp. 8 - 10, p. 22.
-
4Registration Under the Advisers Act of Certain Hedge Fund Advisers, 69 Fed. Reg. 72,089 (Dec. 10, 2004). (to be codified at 17 C. F. R. 275 & 279).
-
5David Schneider, If at First You Dont Succeed: Why the SEC Should Try and Try Again to Regulate Hedge Fund Advisers, 9 J. Bus. & Sec. L.(2009).p. 281.
-
6Goldstein v. SEC, 451 F. 3d 873,873 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
-
7Adam R. Bolter, Note, Regulation of Hedge Fund Advisers: A Valid Exercise of Rulemaking Authority or The Promulgation of New Law?, 57 ADMIN. L. REV. (2005),p. 595,p. 601,p.604.
-
8Anita K. Krug, The Hedge Fund Transparency Act of 2009,http://www. law. berkeley, edu/files/Hedge_FundTransparency_Act_Comments_A. Krug. pdf (最后访问时间:2011年9月2日).
-
9CCH Attorney- Editor staff, Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act Law, Explanation and Analysis, Wolters Kluwer, 2010, p. 184.
-
10Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basell Ⅲ, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2011.3 ,p. 417.
-
1谭保罗.股权质押:A股还未引爆的“定时炸弹”[J].南风窗,2015,0(17):60-62.
-
2王春,齐艳秋.投资银行的核心业务:企业购并[J].经济咨询,2001(4):29-31.
-
3王敏.创业板:科技造市[J].科技中国,2008(4):18-30.
-
4韩令国.房租暴涨该怪谁[J].今日财富(财智领袖),2010(8):38-38.
-
5刘爱武,王瑞.投“人保”后车祸受伤能否获得两份赔偿?[J].伴你同行,2010(6):10-11.
-
6沈旭文,裴永宅(图).兴业:资金业务“造市者”[J].环球企业家,2012(14):92-95.
-
7高明明.我弟弟能否起诉索要后续治疗费[J].人大建设,2008(6):56-56.
-
8毛晓刚.华尔街是最大的假货制造商[J].乡镇企业导报,2009(1):12-13.
-
9贸然与肇事者和解错失巨额保险赔偿[J].农村青年,2009(12):42-42.
-
10王铮.理财产品风险上升[J].上海国资,2013(1):38-39. 被引量:1