期刊文献+

静库容计算方法的比较分析 被引量:25

Contrast and Analysis of Reservoir Storage Calculation Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 库容计算常用的基本方法有数字高程模型(DEM)法、方格网法、断面法、等高线法等4种。在实际应用中,由于水下地形的多样性、复杂性,同一水域采用不同的计算方法其库容量均有不同程度的差异。基于此,对静库容计算的4种方法的基本原理、数学模型进行了讨论,并结合实例对4种方法的适用情况、所需条件及精度情况进行了比较分析,认为数字高程模型(DEM)法在静库容计算中更具有优势。 There are DEM, grid, transect, and contours four methods for reservoir storage calculation in civil engineering. On account of the diversity and complexity of underwater topography, different calculation methods adopted in the same waters have some differences in the practical engineering applications. Therefore, it is vital to which calculation method can be utilized, which math model should be adopted, and what the accuracy of reservoir storage calculation is. This article will deal with the contrast and analysis in advantages and disadvantages of math model and its applications, but DEM has the superiority in the four methods, based on the basic principle of above four methods. Combining with the practical example, the article else will discuss their application range, condition and precision theoretically.
出处 《地矿测绘》 2007年第2期1-4,11,共5页 Surveying and Mapping of Geology and Mineral Resources
关键词 库容计算 DEM法 方格网法 断面法 等高线法 比较 分析 reservoir storage calculation DEM ( digital elevation model) method grid method transect method contour method contrast analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1唐海燕.常见立体体积计算的一个统一公式[J].中学数学教学,1995(S1):14-16. 被引量:1
  • 2张艳杰,叶剑,刘崇选,董为民,赵小利.工程上常见几何体体积计算[J].水资源与水工程学报,2004,15(3):40-44. 被引量:1
  • 3秦惠承.动态库容调洪的数值计算[J].水利学报,1983,(1):42-50.
  • 4陈竹生.陆水水库以实测资料考虑动库容进行调洪计算的探讨[J].人民长江,1980,(4):48-52.
  • 5.GB/T 17941.1-2000.数字测绘产品质量要求[S].,..
  • 6陈述彭 鲁学军 周成虎.地理信患系统导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2000..
  • 7胡上序 陈德钊.观测数据的分析与处理[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,1995..
  • 8.GB/T 17941,1-2000.数字测绘产品质量要求[S].,2000..
  • 9Carrara A, Bitblli G, Carla R. Comparison of Techniques for Generating Digital Terrain Models from Contour Lines[J]. Geographic Information Systems, 1997,11 (5) : 451-473.
  • 10Gao J. Construction of Regular Grid DEMs from Digitized Contour Lines: A Comparative Study of Three Interpolators[J]. Geographic Information Systems, 2001,7 (1) : 8 - 15.

共引文献41

同被引文献200

引证文献25

二级引证文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部