1[1]Hodge K,K McNeal J E Terris MK,et al.Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.J Urol,1989;142:71
2[2]Norberg M,Egevad L,Holmberg I,et al.The sextant protocol forultrasound guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer.Urology,1997;50:526
3[3]Vashi AR, Wojno KJ, Gillespie B,et al.A model for the number of cor e perporsate biopsy based on patient age and prostate volume.J Urol,1998;159:920
4[4]Eskew LA,Bare RL,McCullorgh DL.Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for dianosing carcionoma of the prostate.J Urol,1997;157:199
5[5]Uzzo RC,Wei JT,Waldbaum RS,et al.The influence of prostate size on cancer detection.Urology,1995;46:831
6[6]Karakiewicx PI,Razxinet M,Aprikian AG,et al.Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume.Urology,1997;49:55
7[7]Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies.Urology,1995;45:2
8[8]Hammerer P,Huland H.Systematic sextant biopsies in 651 patients
