1Aboody, D. , M. E. Barth, and R. Kasznik. 1999. Revaluation of fixed assets and future firm performance: evidence from the UK. Journal of accounting and Economics 26 (January) : 149 - 178
2Alciatore M. , P. Easton, N. Spear. 2000. Accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets: evidence from the petroleum industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29, 151-172
3Barth, M. E. 1994. Fair value accounting: evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. The Accounting Review. Vol. 69, No. 1, January.
4Barth, M. E. , W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 1996. Value-relevance of hanks' fair value disclosures under SFAS 107. The Accounting Review 71 (October): 513 -537.
5Barth, M. E. & G. Clinch. 1998. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 36 supplement 1998.
6Brickner, D. R. 2002. An analysis of the factors impacting the relevance of SFAS No. 107 fair value disclosures, PhD dissertation, Kent State University Graduate School of Management.
7Choy A. K. 2005. Fair Value as a Relevant Metric: A Theoretical Investigation. Working paper. Washington University.
8Dietrich, J. R. , M. S. Harris & K. A. Muller. 2001. The reliability of investment property fair value estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (2001) 125 - 158.
9FASB. 2005. Working Draft, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15X, Fair Value Measurement, October.
10Landsman, R. W. , K Peasnell, P. Pope, and S. Yen. 2005. The value relevance of alternative methods of accounting for employee stock options, working paper, University of North Carolina.
