期刊文献+

体外药动学模型中恩诺沙星对猪大肠杆菌的药效研究 被引量:8

Pharmacodynamic effect of enrofloxacin against Escherichia coli in in vitro pharmacokinetic model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为使畜禽专用的喹诺酮类药物更合理地应用,通过建立体外模型的方法,研究了恩诺沙星对大肠杆菌的药效。结果,在消除半衰期为3 h的模型内,2MIC(最小抑菌浓度)的恩诺沙星对猪大肠杆菌仅能抑制4 h,模型运行4 h后细菌出现再生长。5MIC和8MIC的恩诺沙星对猪大肠杆菌可抑制6 h,模型运行6 h后细菌出现再生长。16MIC的恩诺沙星可在模型运行期间对猪大肠杆菌产生持续的抑制杀灭作用。在消除半衰期为6.5 h的模型内,2MIC的恩诺沙星对猪大肠杆菌仅能抑制4 h,模型运行4 h后细菌出现再生长。5MIC、8MIC和16MIC的恩诺沙星可在模型运行期间对猪大肠杆菌产生持续的抑制杀灭作用,4 h已经不能检测到猪大肠杆菌的存在。结果表明,若要使恩诺沙星发挥持续的抗菌效果,保持Cmax/MIC大于一定数值,同时维持有足够高的AUC0→24/MIC是非常必要的。 For the rational usage of fluoroquinolones in livestock and poultry, an in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to study pharmacodynamic effect of enrofloxacin against Escherichia coli. In consequence,in the in vitro model with elimination half-life of 3 h,E. coli was inhibited for 4 h by 2MIC enrofloxacin and for 6 h by 5MIC and 8MIC enrofloxacin. E. coli was continuously inhibited in the entire experiment period of 12 h by 16MIC enrofloxacin. In the in vitro model with elimination half-life of 6.5 h,E. coli was inhibited only for 4 h by 2MIC enrofloxacin,and E. coli regrew after the model worked about for 4 h. E. coli was killed by 5MIC,SMIC and 16MIC enrofloxacin. E. coli was not detected after the model worked about for 4 h. It is concluded that Cmax/MIC and AUC0→24/MIC are the most important factors that influence pharmacodynamics of enrofloxacin against E. coli.
出处 《中国兽医科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第7期636-640,共5页 Chinese Veterinary Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30200205)
关键词 药动模型 药效 恩诺沙星 大肠杆菌 体外 pharmacokinetic model pharmacodynamics enrofloxacin Escherichia coli in vitro
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1王睿.抗菌药物PK/PD参数对合理设计给药方案的意义[J].中国药师,2003,6(12):806-809. 被引量:48
  • 2YOSHITAKA Y,TAKAYOSHI O,HIROSHI N,et al.Application of logistic growth model to pharmacodynamic analysis of in vitro bactericidal kinetics[J].J Pharm Sci,1998,87(10):1177-1182.
  • 3SARASOLA P,LEES P,ALIABADI F S,et al.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of danafloxacin administrated by two dosing regimens in calves infected with Mannheimia (Pasteurella)haemolytica[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2002.46(7):3013-3019.
  • 4WALKER R D,PRESCOTT J F,BAGGOT J D.Fluoroquinolones in antimicrobial therapy[J].Vet Med,2000(3):315-318.
  • 5LINDECRONA R H,FRIIS C,JENSEN N E.The pharmacodynamic effect of amoxicillin and danfloxacin against Actinobacillus pleuropeneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model[J].ResVet Sc,1999,67(1):93-97.
  • 6曾振灵,冯淇辉.恩诺沙星在猪体内的生物利用度及药物动力学研究[J].中国兽医学报,1996,16(6):606-612. 被引量:45
  • 7夏文江 成章瑞.MCPKP-药物动力学室分析的一种微机程序[J].中国药理学报,1988,9:188-188.
  • 8CHAMBERS S T,PEDDIE B A,ROBSON R A,et al.Antimicrobial effects of lomefloxaein in vitro[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,1991,27(4):481-489.
  • 9DRUSANO G L,JOHNSON D E,ROSEN M,et al.Pharmacodynammics of fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas sepsis[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1993,37(3):483-490.
  • 10LEGGETT J E,EBERT S,FANTIN B,et al.Comparative dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals for beta-lactam.aminoglycoside and quinolone antibiotics against Gramnegative bacilli in murine thigh infection an pneumonitis[J].Scand J In fect Dis,1991,74(Suppl):179-184.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Gover AU. Impact of the antibiotic dosage schedule on efficacy in experiment softt tissue infection[J]. Scan J Infect Dis,1990,74. (suppl):147.
  • 2James JK, Palmer SM, Levin DP, et al. Comparison if convientional dosing verse continuous-infusion vaneomycin therapy for patients with suspected or documented gram-positive infections [ J]. Antimicobial Agents Chemother,1996,40 : 696.
  • 3Tumidge JD, Gudmundsson S, Vogelman B, et al. The postantibiotic effect of antifungal agents against common pathogenic yeasts[J]. Journal of Antimicobial Chemother, 1994,34 : 83.
  • 4Meibohm B, Derendorf H. Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/phamacodynamic(PK/PD) modeling[J], Int J Clinical Phamaco Therapeutics. 1997,35(10):401.
  • 5Vogelrnan B, Gudmundsson S, Leggett J, et al. Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model[J]. J Infect Dis, 1988,158:831-847.
  • 6Craig WA. Antimicrobial resistance issues of the future[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 1996,25:213-217.
  • 7Tomqvist IO, Holm SE, Cars O. Phamacodynamic effects of Stabinhibitory antibiotic concentrations[J]. Scand J Infent Dis, 1991(Supple),74:94-101.
  • 8Zhao XL, Drlica K. Restricting the selection of antibiotic resistant mutants: a general strategy derived from fluoroquinolone studies [ J ]. Clin Infect Dis,2001,33(supple) : 147-156.
  • 9Craig WA. Kinetics of antibiotics in relation to effective and conventient outpatient parenteral therpy[J]. Int J Antimir Agents, 1995,5:19-22.
  • 10Craig WA. Beijing International Symposiun on Antibiotics, 2000,S1.1.

共引文献119

同被引文献120

引证文献8

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部