律师与公证员调查权之比较

The Comparison between a Lawyer′s Right of Investigation and a Notary′s Right of Investigation

在我国,调查权的性质只能从权力(利)行使者的角度去判断。对于除国家机关及其工作人员以外的其他主体的调查权,法律总是表现出一定的漫不经心。现行体制和法律都没有明晰律师和公证机构的性质,因此对这二者调查权的分析也就无法明确身份。但通过对二者的比较,还是可以发现问题:律师与公证人员在社会定位和职业要求上的巨大差异,凸现出目前我国法律对公证机构的错误定位。

In our country the nature of investigation right can only be judged from the aspect of right performers. The law always shows unconcern to the investigation right of the subjects other than governmental organs and staff. Neither the current system nor law makes clear the lawyer＇s nature or the notarial organ＇s nature, so that the analysis of their investigation right can not get a clear identity. Through the comparison, however, such a problem can be found that there＇re great differences of social position and professional needs between lawyers and notaries, which displays the wrong orientation given by our law.