期刊文献+

主体选择:地方政府绩效评估研究的视角及问题域 被引量:3

Subject Choice:A Research Vision and Problem Domain of Local Government Performance Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 主体选择是地方政府绩效评估的研究视角,地方政府绩效评估主体选择的基础理论、系统构成、制度保障及运作机制等构成了地方政府绩效评估主体选择研究问题域中的基本问题。我国地方政府绩效评估的主体包括公共权力组织、公众及公共性社会中介组织。保障和巩固公共权力组织主导的、以公共性社会中介组织为主体的公众本位循环评估机制,必须加强评估主体选择的制度建设。 Subject choice is a research vision of local government performance evaluation, and its basic theories, system structures, institutional guarantees and operating mechanism constitute the basic problems in subject research region. Subjects of local government performance evaluation include that public authority organizations, the public and common social intermediary organizations. To ensure and consolidate the circular appraisal mechanism lead by public authority organizations, mainly composed by public social intermediary organizations and the public - oriented, should strengthen the efforts in constructing the institution of subject choice.
作者 曾友中
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2007年第4期19-22,共4页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 主体选择 地方政府绩效评估 运作机制 制度保障 subject choice local government performance evaluation operating mechanism institutional guarantees
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1彭国甫.地方政府绩效评估程序的制度安排[J].新华文摘,2005,(8).
  • 2[3]R.E.Freeman,strategic,mangement:A Stakeholder Aproach[M].boston:Pitman,1984.
  • 3[5]Kamensky,John.Role of Reinventing Government in Federal Management Reform.Public Administration Review:56 (3).
  • 4[4][法]托克维尔.论美国的民主:下卷[M].董果良,译.北京:商务印书馆,1988:565-566.
  • 5马克.霍哲(Marc Holzer),张梦中.公共部门业绩评估与改善[J].中国行政管理,2000(3):36-40. 被引量:130
  • 6[德]柯武刚 韩朝华(译).制度经济学:社会秩序与公共政策[M].商务印书馆,2000..
  • 7[11]柳新元.利用冲突与制度变迁[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002.
  • 8余敏江,潘信林.宪政主义公共管理论纲——公共管理发展方向之初探[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,29(6):93-100. 被引量:12

二级参考文献38

  • 1罗伯特·B·丹哈特,珍妮特·V·丹哈特,刘俊生,张庆东.新公共服务:服务而非掌舵[J].中国行政管理,2002(10):38-44. 被引量:441
  • 2Colwell, W. L.&. Koletar, J. W. (1984).:Performance Measurement for Criminal Justice: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Experience" Public Productivity Review Ⅷ(3):pp. 207-224.
  • 3Conference Proceedings of the 1993 Managing for Results: Performance Measures in Government.Auston, Texas, October 27-29.
  • 4Epstein, Paul D. (1992). "Measuring the Performance of Public Service," in M. Holzer (ed.), Public Productivity Handbook. Marcel Dekker:NY, (pp.161-194).
  • 5Epstein, Paul D. Using Performance Measurement in Local Government:A Guide to Improving Decisions, Performance and Accountability. National Civic League Press, 1988.
  • 6Fischer, R.J. (1994). "An Overview of Performance Measurement." Public Management 76:pp.S2-S8.
  • 7Glover, Mark. (1992). A Practical Guide for Measuring Program Eiiiciency and Effectiveness inLocal Government. Tampa, FL: Innovation Group Publication .
  • 8Government accounting Standards Board, Service Effort and Accomplishment Measuers. 1997.Norwalk, CT.
  • 9Government Performance Results Act of 1993. Washington, D.C. :Government Printing Office. 1993.
  • 10Halachmi, Arie, and Marc Holzer, eds. "Produetivity Measurement and Management. " (Public Prgductivity Review, 44) San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass,1987.

共引文献154

同被引文献73

引证文献3

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部