摘要
本文是对安介生《北魏道武帝早年经历考辨——与李凭先生商榷》一文的回答。道武帝早年曾有被迫内徙长安和流徙蜀地的经历,这个观点由周一良提出,李凭对此作了考证。周一良"部分观点前后有较大的转变"的说法并不确实。另外,安文将羌俗、儒家文化、汉文化三者混为一谈是不符合逻辑的。至于道武帝厌恶羌俗的事例,非但不是他不曾迁居长安的明证,反而说明他了解长安附近的风俗,因而有利于李凭原先的论证。
This article is an answer to the paper 'A Study of the Early Experience of Emperor Daowu of Northern Wei Dynasty: A Discussion with Mr. Li Ping.' It is a question mentioned by Zhou Yiliang (周一良) that the Emperor Daowu experienced the forced movement to Chang-an and exile to Sichuan in his early age. Li Ping exam it in his book. The statement that a part of the viewpoint about the question changed is not ture. It is illogical that An Jiesheng mix the Qiangsu (羌俗, foreign culture), Confucius and culture of the Han. The example that Emperor Daowu hated the Qiangsu can not prove that he had not liven in Chang-an, but prove that he known the custom around Chang-an. So, it is an evidence supporting to Li Ping's viewpoint.
出处
《民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期59-64,共6页
Ethno-National Studies
关键词
北魏道武帝《魏书》羌俗
Emperor Daowu of the Northern Wei
Wei Shu (History of the Wei)
Qiangsu.