期刊文献+

初产妇与经产妇分娩后一周内尿动力学表现分析 被引量:5

Urodynamic study on primipara and bipara after parturition
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨初产妇与经产妇分娩后1周内的尿动力学表现。方法按照国际尿控协会推荐的方法对36例初产妇志愿者(初产妇组)和12例经产妇志愿者(经产妇组)分娩后1周内(产后2~7 d)的尿动力学变化进行检查。14例因上尿路疾病而下尿路功能正常的已婚未育妇女作为对照组。结果初产妇组与经产妇组妇女分娩后功能性膀胱容量(FBV)分别为(310±154)、(243±141)ml,正常尿意膀胱压测定容量(NDCC)分别为(215±90)、(225±115)ml,均低于对照组的(437±193)ml 和(338±120)ml,分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);但初产妇组与经产妇组间FBV 和 NDCC 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。初产妇组与经产妇组妇女最大静态尿道压(MUP)和最大尿道闭合压(MCUP)也均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但初产妇组MUP 和 MCUP 与经产妇组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。功能尿道长度(FUL)初产妇组妇女为(31±6)mm,经产妇组妇女为(27±5)mm,对照组妇女为(30±3)mm,初产妇、经产妇组分别与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但初产妇组 FUL 显著长于经产妇组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。初产妇组、经产妇组及对照组的 Abrams-Griffiths(AG)值分别为-35±28、-26±26和-11±17,两产妇组分别与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);初产妇组、经产妇组及对照组尿道阻力因子(URA)分别为(8±4)、(9±3)和(11±3)cm H_2O(1 am H_2O=0.098 kPa),3组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。初产妇组和经产妇组腹压漏尿点压(VLPP)测定各有1例漏尿发生,VLPP 分别为50 cm H_2O和67 cm H_2O。结论初产妇和经产妇分娩后1周内均表现为膀胱容量减少,尿道静态阻力增加,但膀胱排空能力正常。 Objective To investigate the bladder function in primipara and bipara within 1 week after delivery using urodynamic study. Methods Investigations on urodynamic changes were performed in 36 primipara volunteers and 12 bipara volunteers according to the recommendations of the International Continence Society (ICS). Fourteen women with upper urinary tract diseases but having normal lower urinary tract function, who had not experienced parturation were included as controls. Results Functional bladder volume (FBV) of primipara and bipara after delivery and normal desire cytometric capacity (NDCC) were respectively lower than those of control group (437±193 )ml and (338±120 ) ml, however FBV and NDCC between primipara and bipara (310 ±154), (215±90) ml vs (243±141) , (225±115) ml were not significantly different. The static Pure. max and Pure. clos. max of primipara and bipara were respectively higher than those of control group ( 87±7 ) cm H2O ( 1 cm H2O= 0. 098 kPa ) and ( 78±8 ) cm H2O( P 〈 0. 05 ) , but there were no significant differences in Pure. max and Pure. closure, max between primipara and bipara (116±28) cm H2O and (97±25) cm H20 vs (120±31) cm H2O and (106±37) cm H2O. There were significant differences in functional urethral length between primipara( 31± 6 ) mm and bipara (27±5 ) ram. Abrams-Griffiths number ( AG ) and urethral resistance factor ( URA ) of primipara and bipara also showed no significant differences from control group ( 11 ±3 ) cm H2O. Each group had one case with leakage on valsalva action, and valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) was respectively 50 cm H2O and67 cm H2O. Conclusions It is suggested that bladders of primipara and bipara shortly after delivery are sensitive and static urethral pressure parameters are increased, but voiding ability is still normal. There are no significant differences in urodynamic parameters between primipara and bipara.
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第7期453-456,共4页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30571931)
关键词 产褥期 尿动力学 Puerperium Urodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Chaliha C, Bland JM, Monga A, et al. Pregnancy and delivery: a urodynamic viewpoinL BJOG,2000,107 : 1354-1359.
  • 2Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L,et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn, 2002,21:261-274.
  • 3Sampselle CM, Harlow SD, Skumick J, et al. Urinary incontinence predictors and life impact in ethnically diverse perimenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol, 2002,100 : 1230-1238.
  • 4Mason L, Glenn S, Walton I, et al. The prevalence of stress incontinence during pregnancy and following delivery. Midwifery, 1999,15 : 120-128.
  • 5Parboosingh J, Doig A. Studies of noeturia in normal pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, 1973,80:888-895.
  • 6Marshall K, Thompson KA, Walsh DM, et al. Incidence of urinary incontinence and constipation during pregnancy and postpartum: survey of current findings at the Rotunda Lying-In HospitaL Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1998,105:400-402.
  • 7Dimpfl T, Hesse U, Schussler B. Incidence and cause of postpartum urinary stress incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1992,43:29-33.
  • 8Long CY, Hsu SC, Sun DJ, et al. Abnormal clinical and urodynamic findings in women with severe genitourinary prolapse. Kaohsiung J Med Sci,2002,18:593-597.
  • 9Dietz HP, Benness CJ. Voiding function in pregnancy and puerperium. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2005,16: 151-154.
  • 10Eckhardt MD, van Venrooij GE, Boon TA. Urethral resistance factor (URA) versus Schafer's obstruction grade and Abrams- Griffiths (AG) number in the diagnosis of obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. Neurourol Urodyn, 2001,20:175-185.

同被引文献43

  • 1杨欣,郑虹,廖秦平,陶瑞雪,付纯,彭向丽,王丹,栾艳秋.分娩方式对尿失禁发生的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2004,39(10):662-665. 被引量:39
  • 2徐宏里,赵跃宏.子宫脱垂的病因及治疗[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(4):196-197. 被引量:60
  • 3宋岩峰,黄惠娟,许波,何春妮,郝岚,练建华.压力性尿失禁不同手术方式治疗的临床效果分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(5):331-334. 被引量:19
  • 4金锡御.尿道外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.307-308.
  • 5Groutz A,Hadi E,Wolf Y,et al.Early postpartum voiding dysfunction:Incidence and correlation with obstetric parameters[J].J Reprod Med,2004,49(12):960-964.
  • 6Dietz HP,Benness CJ.Voiding function in pregnancy and puerperium[J].Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2005,16(2):151-154.
  • 7TooZs-Hobson P,Balmforth J,Cardozo L,et al.The effect of mode of delivery on pelvic floor functional anatomy[J].Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2008,18(3):407-416.
  • 8Groutz A,Rimon E,Peled S,et al.Cesarean:Does it really prevent the development postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery[J].Neurourol Urodun,2004,23(1):2-6.
  • 9Abrams P,Blaivas JG,Stanton SL,et al.The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function.The International Continence Society Committee on Stan dardisation of Terminology[J].Sean d J Urol Nephrol Suppl,1988,114:5-19.
  • 10张元芳,孙颖浩,王忠.实用泌尿外科和男科学[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:105-106.

引证文献5

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部