1Kamitani T,Yabuuchi H,Soeda H,et al.Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms:compsrison among hard-copy film,3-mcgapixel liquid crystal display (LCD)monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors:an observer performance study.Eur Badiol,2007,17(5):1365-1371.
2De Hauwere A,Bacher K,Smeets P,et al.Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.Radiat Prot Dosmetry,2005,117(1-3):174-117.
3Offiah AC,Moon L,Hall CM,et al.Diangostic accuracy of fracture detection in suspected non-accidental injury:the effect of edge enhancement and digital display on observer performance.Clin Radiol,2006,61(2):163-173.
4Abe K,Kosuda S,lwasaki Y,et al.Soft copy using image proccssing in place of hard copy for detection of subtle pulmonary lesions:is it actually cost-effective? Radiat Med,2004,22(6):379-383.
5Ueda K,leasaki S,Nagasawa M,et al.Hard-copy versus softcopy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiograbhy.Radiat Med,2003,21(5):210-213.
1Kirchner J, Kollath J. Quality assurance measures within DIN 6856: the adaptation of film viewing boxes and their specifications in the radiology department of a university hospital[J]. Deutsche Industrie-Norm. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr,1996,164:146-149.
