《疏证》与《冤词》对垒的思想学术意义

The Academic Implication of Controversy between “Shuzheng” and “Yuanci”

阎若璩的《尚书古文疏证》是清初《书》经辨伪的扛鼎之作,而毛奇龄的《古文尚书冤词》则是持论相左的兴讼问状;《疏证》与《冤词》的对垒,其实也是当时《书》经辨伪与辨真两大阵营最高水平的交锋,其结果不仅从学术上有利于经学研究的深入,同时还从思想根柢上动摇了理学的学问基础,为朴学思潮的发展扫清了障碍。

Yan Ruoqu＇s ＂Shuzheng＂ is quite controversial to Mao Qiling＇s ＂Yuanci＂ in academic realm. Their argument represents the supreme conflict between two different academic schools and facilitates the further study of holly books. Meanwhile, the controversy shakes the foundation of ancient China＇s logic study and removes the barrier of holly books research.