期刊文献+

论检察官审判阶段强制取证权的废除——兼论法庭审判阶段的补充侦查 被引量:14

On the Abolition of Prosecutor's Right to Copulisive Investigations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国刑事案件一经提起公诉之后,检察院依然可以依据职权继续调查取证,甚至可以通过启动补充侦查程序导致法庭审理的中断。这一现状对控审分离、控辩平等、法官中立等基本诉讼结构之维系构成了严重的威胁。法律应当禁止检察官在法庭正式审理过程中的强制取证行为,而赋予其与辩方平等的证据申请权,并在起诉之后、正式审理之前设置专门的起诉审查程序。 In China, when a criminal case has been prosecuted, the prosecutor is still allowed to investigate. Furthermore, he's able to bring a motion for additional investigation, which means the trial has to be postponed. This phenomenon doesnt meet the demands of the criminal proceeding structure such as the separation between prosecution and judjment, the equality between prosecution and defence , the neutralism of judges and so on. Therefore,the power of prosecutor to investigate should be forbidden. However, the law should afford him the right to apply to the court for investigation, which is the same with the defence. And a special procedure shoule be arranged to examine public prosecution.
作者 孙远
出处 《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2007年第3期23-28,共6页 Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词 刑事诉讼 检察机关 强制取证权 补充侦查 起诉审查 additional investigation examination of public prosecution application for investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1克劳思·罗科信.刑事诉讼法[M].吴丽琪,译.北京:法律出版社,2003.273.
  • 2[2]松尾浩也.日本刑事诉讼法:上卷[M].丁相顺,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
  • 3[11]林钰雄.刑事诉讼法:下册[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:63.
  • 4[6]林万生.刑事诉讼举证责任之研究[M].台北:(台湾)"司法院秘书处",1997.
  • 5[7]吴祚丞,许辰舟.刑事证据法则理论体系与实务之研究[M].台北:(台湾)"司法院",2003.

共引文献8

同被引文献136

引证文献14

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部