摘要
公共借阅权制度产生已60年,世界上设立的国家不到1/10。"挤出效应"用假设数据立论缺乏科学性;以英国为例缺乏代表性。图书馆接受捐赠说明"挤出效应"存在片面性。作品与图书是两个不同的概念。著作权与所有权分属两个不同的法律领域。当著作权人不是图书权利人后便没有控制权,公共借阅权,在我国《宪法》与法律中找不到法律依据,也无法通过修改或新增条款寻求法律支持。
The system of public lending right （PLR） has existed for 60 years, but less than 1/10 countries all over the world have established PLR system. “Crowding Out Effect” based on assumed data is lack of scientific principles and taking Britain as an example is less representative. Donations that libraries accept indicate the one-sidedness of “Crowding Out Effect”. Works and books are two different concepts, and the copyright and the ownership belong to two different legal domains, so the copyright holder has no control rights when he is not ownership holder. Public lending right can not find the legal basis in Chinese constitution or other laws, and also can not seek the legal support by amending or adding legal items.
出处
《图书与情报》
CSSCI
2007年第4期63-71,共9页
Library & Information
关键词
公共借阅权
作品与图书
著作权
物权
public lending right（PLR）
works and books
copyright
property right
