期刊文献+

审美概念理解对审美感性水平影响的实验探索 被引量:5

The Effect of Understanding of Aesthetic Feeling on Aesthetic Perceptual Level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通常认为审美理性对审美感性有消极影响。这至少对认知心理学和人工智能的研究与发展形成了一种障碍。本研究以审美概念理解作为审美理性活动的典型式,对二者的实际关系进行探索。实验对象分为A类普通被试和B类艺术专业被试。结果表明:无论是否通过专门的审美概念学习训练,实验组和对照组的审美概念理解与审美感性水平的发展都呈共同上升趋势;通过学习训练,审美概念理解程度有显著提高,且显著有助于AB两类被试审美感受总水平提高;审美概念理解的"合理性"(正确性与精确性)是对审美感性各因素影响的显著因子,而其"事实例举"对于审美感性中的审美感知、审美联想、审美情感等是显著因子。A类小学5年级被试的审美感知和审美情感、B类大学美术专业2年级被试的审美感知,实验前后无显著差异,这表明审美理性对审美感性所具有的积极影响,在一定条件下是有限的。 It is generally accepted that aesthetic reason has a negative impact on aesthetic feeling, which forms an obstacle to the study of cognitive psychology and artificial imelligence. This study aims at exploring the relations between understanding of aesthetic concept and aesthetically rational activity. The subjects included type A (non-arts majors) and type B (art majors). The results indicated that the understanding of aesthetic concept and the level of aesthetic feeling of both the experimental group and the contrast group showed a trend of rising no matter whether the subjects had received training in aesthetic concept or not. This kind of learning and training did improve the subjects" understanding of aesthetic concept significantly and was helpful to improving the aesthetic perception of both types as a whole. And the correctness and accurateness of aesthetic concept understanding were two significant factors that affected all aspects in aesthetic feeling. Among these, fact illustration was a significant factor that influenced aesthetic perception, aesthetic ~ation and aesthetic feeling. There was no significant difference between type A subjects' aesthetic perception and aesthetic feeJing and type B subjects' aesthetic feeling factors before and after the test, which showed the positive effect of aesthetic reason on aesthetic feeling was limited.
作者 赵伶俐
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期878-882,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 审美概念理解 审美理性 审美感性 understanding of aesthetic concept, the aesthetic reason, the aesthetic feeling
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王甦.认知心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992.281-282.
  • 2赵伶俐.审美概念学习效应与迁移的逻辑线路探究[J].心理科学,2002,25(1):60-63. 被引量:8
  • 3赵伶俐.多值逻辑与审美逻辑——论审美认知的逻辑基础[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2003,29(2):22-27. 被引量:13
  • 4赵伶俐.审美概念认知.北京:新华出版社,2004:1-4章
  • 5张顺燕.数学的美与理性.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:2
  • 6比伦特.阿塔拉伊(B.Atalay).达.芬奇的数字迷宫.北京:中信出版社,2007:15
  • 7张顺燕编著.数学的美与理.北京大学出版社,2006
  • 8麦卡里斯特(J.W.McAllister).李为译.美与科学革命.长春:吉林人民出版社,2000:37-39,71-79
  • 9尼葛洛庞帝(N.Negroponte).胡泳、范海燕译.数字化生存.海南:海南出版社,1996:6

二级参考文献9

  • 1赵伶俐.论美感增力性的生理和心理基础——美育科学化原理研究之一[J].西南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,31(4):49-54. 被引量:19
  • 2OiHare D . Multidimensional scaling representations and individual differences in concept learning of artistic style.British Journal of Psychology, 1979; 70 (2): 219 - 230
  • 3Taebel D K . The effect of various instructional modes on childrenis performance of music concept tasks . Journal of Research in Music Education. 1974,22(3) :170 - 183
  • 4Sims W L . Effects of instruction and task format on preschool childrenis music concept discrimination . Joumalof Research in Music Education. 1991 ;39(4) :298 - 183
  • 5Nodine C F, Locher P J , Krupinski EA. The role of formal art training on perception and sesthetic judgement of art compositions. Leonardo, 1993; 26 (3): 219 - 227
  • 6Stephan M. Atransformational theory of aesthetics, 1990
  • 7国家教育部师范司"教师执教行为技术与艺术评价系统研究";国家教委八五规划"审美教育对学生素质全面发展影响的实验研究";全国教育科学九五规划"学校美育系统与美育心理发展实验研究"
  • 8杨振宁,超晶格.后记(1945).科学、教育与中国现代化.人民日报出版社,1987:4-5
  • 9杨振宁.在爱因斯坦邮票发行仪式上的讲话(1966).科学、教育与中国现代化.人民日报出版社,1987

共引文献110

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部