期刊文献+

高强迫症状个体的定向遗忘和元记忆 被引量:7

Directed Forgetting and Metamemory in High Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom Individuals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将定向遗忘和FOK判断的范式相结合,探讨高强迫症状被试(HOC)和低强迫症状的控制组(LOC)在不同词语类型的条件下,线索回忆和元记忆判断的定向遗忘效应的差异。实验结果表明,HOC组在中性词语条件下比LOC组表现出更低的定向遗忘效应。FOK的结果表明HOC被试对于不同条件的元记忆的分辨能力比LOC组要差,他们在威胁性词语方面,对未来记忆任务的成绩也没有预测性。研究结果从一定程度上支持强迫症的一般记忆损伤模型。 Introduction There are disagreements in the interpretation of memory deficits in obsessive - compulsive symptom individuals. Some researchers proposed general memory deficits in the obsessive -compulsive disorder (OCD) population, while others believed that these deficits were a result of the bias toward OC - provoking information. Apart from this, there also was a hypothesis concerning the lack of confidence or metamemory deficits in OCD. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the pathology of OCD, using the information processing approach. Directed forgetting and metamemory performance (feeling - of- knowing (FOK) judgments) for neutral and OC - provoking material was tested in high and low obsessive - compulsive symptom subjects. Method Sixteen high obsessive - compulsive symptom individuals (HOCs) and sixteen low obsessive - compulsive symptom individuals (LOCs) were required to study a list of neutral and OC- provoking word pairs according to the "F" or "R" instructions. After an initial cued - recall test, they provided their FOK judgments for the unrecalled word pairs, followed by a recognition test. Results The results indicated that for neutral words, HOCs exhibited reduced directed forgetting compared to LOCs; this suggests that they were unable to forget unnecessary information. Further, the HOCs were confused in metamemory on account of the different sources and types of words, as reflected in their FOK ratings. Moreover, FOK judgments of the HOCs for OC - provoking words were unreliable predictors of their recognition performance. Conclusions The study supported the idea of a general memory deficit in HOCs; further, it indicated that this may be due to the weak differentiation in HOCs. Further, HOCs exhibited worse metamemory for OC - provoking words and had no forecast for their future performance. In conclusion, HOCs exhibited both real memory and metamemory deficits.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期571-578,共8页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30470568) 首都师范大学学习与认知实验室资助项目 国家攀登计划资助项目(95-专-09)
关键词 强迫症 定向遗忘 元记忆 FOK判断. OCD, directed forgetting, metamemory, FOK
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1American Psychiatric Association. The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM -Ⅳ).Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1994. 205
  • 2Radomsky A S, Rachman S. Memory bias in obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD). Bchaviour Research and Therapy , 1999, 37:605-618
  • 3Gibbs N A. Non - clinical populations in research on obsessive- compulsive disorder: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 1996, 16:729-773
  • 4Sher K J, Mann B, Frost R O. Cognitive dysfunction in compulsive checkers: further explorations. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1984, 22:493-502
  • 5Sher K J, Frost R O, Kushner M, et al. Memory deficits in compulsive checkers: replication and extension in a clinical sample. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 1989, 27:65-70
  • 6Tuna S, Tekcan A I, Topcuogtu V. Memory and metamemory in obsessive compulsive disorder,Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2005, 43:15 -27
  • 7Schmidtke K, Alexander S, Gabriele W, et al. Cognitive Frontal Lobe Dysfunction in Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 1998, 43:666-673
  • 8Jeffrey M, John E R. Memory and attention in Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder: a review. Anxiety Disorder, 2005, 19:1 -28
  • 9Radomsky A S, Rachman S, Hammond D. Memory bias, confidence and responsibility in compulsive checking. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2001, 39: 813 - 822
  • 10Ceschi G, der Linden M V, Dunker D, et al. Further exploration memory bias in compulsive washers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2003, 41:737 -747

二级参考文献38

  • 1钟杰,钱铭怡.中文情绪形容词检测表的编制与信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):9-13. 被引量:46
  • 2Sanavio E.Obsessions and Compulsions:The Padua Inventory.Behaviour Research and Therapy,1988,26:169-177.
  • 3Muris P,Merckelbach H,Clavan M.Abnormal and normal compulsions.Behaviour Research and Therapy,1997,35:249-252.
  • 4Kyrios M,Bhar S,Wade D.The assessment of obsessivecompulsive phenomena:psychometric and normative data on the Padua Inventory from an Australian non-clinical student sample.Behaviour Research and Therapy,1996,37:85-95.
  • 5Macdonald A,Silva P.The assessment of obsessionality using the Padua Inventory:its validity in a British nonclinical sample.Personality and Individual Differences,1999,27:1027-1046.
  • 6Sternberger L,Burns G.Obsessions and compulsions:psychometric properties of the Padua Inventory with an American college population.Behaviour Research and Therapy,1990,28:341-345.
  • 7Oppen P.Obsessions and compulsions:dimensional structure,reliability,convergent and divergent validity of the Padua Inventory.Behaviour Research and Therapy,1992,32:631-637.
  • 8Mohamman A,Firoozabbadi A.Reliability and validity of the Padua Inventory in an Iranian population.Behaviour Research and Therapy,2005,43:43-54.
  • 9Mancini F,Gragnani A,Orazi F,Pietrangeli MG.Obsessions and compulsions:normative data on the Padua Inventory from an Italian non-clinical adolescent sample.Behaviour Research and Therapy,1999,37:919-925.
  • 10Ember CR,Ember M.Cross-cultural research methods.Lanham,MD:AltaMira Press,2001.1-164.

共引文献192

同被引文献98

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部