期刊文献+

谎言运算机制初探 被引量:2

A Tentative Study on the Operational Mechanism of Lies
原文传递
导出
摘要 撒谎是暗中以一种虚假信息代替真实信息的言语信息操纵行为。谎言之所以能够生成并具有可信性,是变相利用隐喻运算模式,即在共享特征C的基础上断言"A是B".由于运作方式不同,隐喻在语句层面的显性虚假产生的可推导性使得某个真实意义得以在推理中呈现;而谎言的"A是B"模式由于缺少真假的显性冲突而使得谎言在语句层面无懈可击,从而具有蒙蔽性。 Lying is a kind of information manipulation conduct to substitute truthful information with false information in secret. Sharing the similar operational mechanism of metaphor is what enables lies to be generated and convincing, i.e. to claim "A is B" based on their shared trait C. What make metaphors and lies different in essence are the ways they are operated. The ostentatious flout in a metaphorical sentence leads to the calculability of conversational implicature, while the "( A is ) B" formula of a lie sentence causes people to mistake B for A without the co-existence of A and B, thus acquiring its fraudulence.
作者 章丽霞 杨舒
机构地区 中国矿业大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期43-46,共4页 Foreign Language Research
基金 江苏省高校人文社会科学研究项目(编号为04SJD740030)的阶段性成果
关键词 谎言 运算机制 隐喻 lie operational mechanism metaphor
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1曹道根.认知层面上的反语典型性条件考察[J].外语学刊,2005(2):44-49. 被引量:4
  • 2任平.礼记直解[M].杭州:浙江文艺出版社,2000:535.
  • 3叔本华 范进译.叔本华论说文集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999..
  • 4魏东波.认知语言学框架中语义研究反思[J].外语学刊,2006(5):68-70. 被引量:11
  • 5杨秀杰.隐喻及其分类新论[J].外语学刊,2005(3):41-45. 被引量:36
  • 6Bayraktaroglu,A.& Sifianou,M.Introduction[A].Bayraktaroglu,A.& Sifianou,M.Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries:the Case of Greek and Turkish[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2001.
  • 7Brown,P.& Levinson,S.C.Politeness:Some Universals in Language Usage[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1987.
  • 8Freud,S.Freud's Readings of the Unconscious and Arts[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998..
  • 9Grice,P.Studies in the Way of Words[M].Harvard University Press,1989.
  • 10Lakoff,G.& Johnson,M.Metaphors We Live by[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.

二级参考文献23

  • 1王寅.认知语义学[J].四川外语学院学报,2002,18(2):58-62. 被引量:82
  • 2王寅.荀子论语言的体验认知辩证观——语言哲学再思考:语言的体验性(之五)[J].外语学刊,2006(5):1-7. 被引量:22
  • 3赵艳芳.认知语言学概论[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2002..
  • 4Fauconnier, G., Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. London:The MIT Press, 1985.
  • 5Fauconnier, G., Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 6Kreuz, R. & S. Glucksberg, How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of irony [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1989(118): 174-386.
  • 7Kumon- Nakamura, S., S., Glucksberg, & M., Brown, How about another piece of the pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995(124): 3-21.
  • 8Levinson, S. C., Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 9Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Irony and Use - Mention Distinction [A]. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics[C]. New York:Academic Press, 1981.
  • 10Sperber, D. & Wilson, D., Relevance: Communication and Cognition [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

共引文献63

同被引文献20

  • 1曹道根.认知层面上的反语典型性条件考察[J].外语学刊,2005(2):44-49. 被引量:4
  • 2章礼霞.辩证看待语言的符号性[J].天津外国语学院学报,2005,12(4):38-43. 被引量:3
  • 3Miller Gerald R,Stiff James B.Deceptive Communication[M]. SAGE Publications, 1993,28(3):51-1 17.
  • 4Fauconnier,G.Mappings in Thought and Language[M].London: Cambridge University Press, 1997:1 1.
  • 5Fauconnier,G.&M.Turner.Conceptual Integration Networks[J]. Cognitive Science, 1998, (2): 133-187.
  • 6Fauconnier,G.&M.Turner.The Way We Think [M].Basic Books, 2002:139.
  • 7Ekman P,Friesen W V.Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception [M].Psychiatry,1969,32:88-105.
  • 8Zukerman M,DePaulo B M,Rosenthal R.Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception [M].Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1981,14:1-60.
  • 9谭克良.谎言的魔力[M].北京:时事出版社,2001.225.
  • 10(美)艾克曼(Ekman,paul)著,刘文荣,今夫译.识破谎言[M]. 广西民族出版社, 1992

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部