期刊文献+

浙江省主要恶性肿瘤失能权重评定 被引量:7

Evaluation on disability weights of cancers in Zhejiang province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评定浙江省恶性肿瘤疾病的失能权重。方法以全球疾病负担研究中疾病失能权重7级分类标准及22个指示症状为依据,采用德尔菲法,选择10名肿瘤临床专家和18名公共卫生专家,通过自制的专家咨询表评定浙江省恶性肿瘤疾病失能权重的最小值和最大值。结果专家咨询表回收率100%,13种恶性肿瘤的疾病失能权重最小值的均数为0.19~0.36,最大值的均数为0.70~0.90。结论13种恶性肿瘤疾病失能权重的评定结果与世界银行全球疾病负担(GBD)研究及荷兰的数据有一定差异。 Objective To evaluate the disability weights of cancers in Zhejiang. Methods Based on the criteria of a seven classes of disability and 22 indicator conditions in Global Burden of Disease (GBD), 10 clinical experts and 18 public health experts were selected in terms of Delphi method for evaluating the minimal and maximal disability weights of cancers by using self-regulating experts consultation questionnaire. Results Response rate of questionnaire was 100 %. The mean minimal and maximal disability weights of 13 kinds of cancers was 0.19- 0.36 and 0.70 - 0.90, respectively. Conclusion Difference was found between the results of this study with the data of GBD and Dutch study in the mean disability weights for those cancers.
出处 《中国公共卫生》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期931-933,共3页 Chinese Journal of Public Health
基金 淅江省医药卫生重点科技项目(2003ZD004)
关键词 恶性肿瘤 失能权重 德尔菲法 cancers disability weights Delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部.2005年中国卫生统计提要[EB].http://www.moh.gov.cn/news/sub-index.aspx?tp_class=C3.
  • 2The World Bank.World development report 1993-investing in health[R].New York:Oxford University Press,1993.
  • 3Murray CJL,Lopez.Global comparative assessment in the health sector:Quantifying the burden of disease,technical basis for disability-adjusted life years[R].Geneva:World Health Organization,1994.
  • 4Murray CJL,Lopez AD.The global burden of disease:global burden of disease and injury series volume I[R].Geneva:World Health Organization,1996.
  • 5马进,张毓辉,孔巍,谷励,夏芹,栾霁冬,王金印,刘世斌,滕燕.2001年哈尔滨市肺结核疾病负担研究[J].中国卫生经济,2003,22(7):27-30. 被引量:14
  • 6Mathers CD,Lopez A,Stein C,et al.Deaths and disease burden by cause:global burden of disease estimates for 2001 by world bank country groups[R].Working Paperl8.Bethesda,Md:Disease Control Priorities Project.
  • 7Stouthard M,Essink-Bot M,Bonsel G,et al.Disability weights for diseases in the Netherlands[R].Rotterdam:Department of Public Health,Erasmus University,1997.
  • 8冯鹤声,王苏中,姚崇华,苏江莲,胡先芝.北京市安贞小区脑卒中危险因素的调查分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,1994,13(3):129-132. 被引量:37

二级参考文献12

  • 1世界卫生组织宏观经济与卫生委员会.宏观经济与卫生.投资卫生领域促进经济发展[M].北京:人民卫生出版社与世界卫生组织,2002..
  • 2Bowie C. , Beck S. , et al. Estimating the burden of disease in an English region, Journal of Public Health Medicine, ( 19 ) : 87-92,1997.
  • 3United Nation, World Development Report 1993. New York, United Nations, 1993.
  • 4Chirstopher J. L. Murray, Lopes, et al. Global Comparative assessment in the health sector:Quantifying the burden of disease:technical basis for disability-Adjusted Life Years, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1994.
  • 5christopher J. L. Murray, Lopez, et al. Golbal Comparative assessmerit in the health sector : Quantifying disability : data, methods and results, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1994.
  • 6Williams a. Calculating the global burden of disease: time for a strategic reappraisal? Health Economics, (8) : 1-8,1999.
  • 7Chirstopher J. L. Murray alan D. Lopez: Progress and Directions in Refining the Global Burden of Disease Approach: A Response to Williams, Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No. 1, World Health Organization, 2000.
  • 8Christopher J. L. Murray, alan D Lopez et at. The Global Burden of Disease 2000 Project: Aims, Methods and Data Sources, Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No. 36 World Health Organization, November 2001.
  • 9Colin D. Mathers, Claudia Stein, et al . Global Burden of Disease 2000: Version 2 methods and results, Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No. 50, World Health Organiaztion, October 2002.
  • 10Mathers Cd, Vos T, Lopez AD, Ezzafi M. , National Burden of Disease Studies : A Practical Guide, Edition 1.0. , Geneva, World Health Organization, Global Program on Evidence for Health Policy, 2001.

共引文献48

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部