期刊文献+

经尿道双极等离子电切治疗重度前列腺增生症 被引量:2

Transurethral resection with bipolar plasma kinetic technique in the treatment of large volume benign prostate hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道双极等离子电切治疗重度前列腺增生症的安全性和有效性。方法采用英国佳乐公司生产的双极等离子体系统经尿道切除重度前列腺增生72例,术后随访3月。观察术前、术后最大尿流率、前列腺症状评分和残余尿量的变化。结果前列腺质量平均(72.00±20.00)g,平均手术时间(82.00±36.00)min,术后平均留置尿管(4.00±1.00)d,术后平均住院时间(4.50±1.50)d,最大尿流率由术前的(6.00±1.50)ml/s上升至术后3个月的(14.10±4.70)ml/s,前列腺症状评分术前为(34.70±1.20)分,术后3个月降至(5.30±1.00)分,残余尿量从(150.00±80.00)ml降至(20.00±50.00)ml,三项指标术前术后比较差异均有统计学意义(t分别=27.31、254.64、25.92,P均<0.05),无前列腺电切综合征发生。结论经尿道双极等离子前列腺电切术治疗重度前列腺增生安全有效。 Objective To discuss the effect and safety of transurethral plasma kinetic vaporization of large volume prostate hyperplasia. Methods Seventy two cases of large volume prostate hyperplasia were treated with bipolar plasma kinetic (PKRP). 3 months were followed up in 72 cases. The changes of maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax) ,international prostate symptom score (IPSS) , and residual urine volume before and after operation were observed. Results Average weight of dissected prostate tissue was ( 72.00 ± 20.00) g, Average operation time was ( 82.00 ±36.00) min, average catheter detention was ( 4.00 ± 1.00) days after operation, average postoperative stay was (4.50 ± 1.50) days. The peak flow rate increased from (6. 00 ± 1.50) ml/s to ( 14.10 ± 4.70) ml/s, IPSS scores decreased from ( 34.70 ± 1.20) to (5.30 ± 1.00) at 3 months after operation ; residual urine volume deceased from ( 150.00 ± 80.00) ml to ( 20.00 ± 50.00) ml. There were significant differences ( t = 27.31, 254.64, 25.92, P 〈 0.05) . No occurrence of transurethral resection syndrome. Conclusion PKRP is safe and effective in the treatment of large volume benign prostate hyperplasia.
出处 《全科医学临床与教育》 2007年第4期296-297,307,共3页 Clinical Education of General Practice
关键词 双极等离子 重度前列腺增生症 bipolar plasma kinetic technique large volume prostate hyperplasia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献11

  • 1叶敏,张良,陈建华,孔良,王伟明,马邦一,蒋鹤鸣.经尿道前列腺电汽化术治疗前列腺增生症[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(7):417-420. 被引量:190
  • 2Botto H,Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrus Device. J Endourol,2001,15 : 319-322.
  • 3Ramsey EW. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol,2000,7 : 1135-1143.
  • 4Mebust W, Hohgrewe H, Coeket APC, et al. Transurethral prostectomy: immediate and post operative complication. A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3 885 patients. J Uro1,1989,141:243-247.
  • 5Virdi J, Kapasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163 (4 suppl) :268-269.
  • 6Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign pro6tatic enlargement : the CLasP study. J Urol,2000 ,164 :65-70.
  • 7梅骅.泌尿外科手术学[M](第二版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.804.
  • 8Tunguntla HS, Evans CP. Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J ]. World J Urol. 2002,20(4) : 197-206.
  • 9章咏裳.正确掌握操作技术,积极开展TURP手术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(8):511-512. 被引量:70
  • 10孙传洋,单玉喜,颜纯海.重度前列腺增生症经尿道前列腺电气化切割术[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2001,16(3):129-130. 被引量:14

共引文献267

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部