期刊文献+

MRI全景矩阵成像技术在全身骨转移瘤诊断中的价值 被引量:5

The Evaluation of MRI with Total Imaging Matrix for Patients of Bone Metastases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨全景矩阵成像(TIM)技术对全身骨转移瘤的诊断价值。资料与方法对25例恶性肿瘤患者采用单光子发射计算机断层显像(SPECT)进行全身骨扫描与TIM技术全身MRI扫描,对两种检查方法进行评价比较。结果25例中,MRI-TIM及SPECT共检出23例63个病灶,其中恶性54个、良性9个,TIM正确诊断50个转移瘤病灶,敏感度为93%(50/54),特异度为67%(6/9),阳性预测值为94%(50/53),阴性预测值为60%(6/10)。SPECT正确诊断47个病灶,敏感度为87%(47/54),特异度为56%(5/9),阳性预测值为92%(47/51),阴性预测值为42%(5/12)。两种检查方法的敏感度与特异度之间的差异均无统计学意义(P值分别为0.077和0.643)。全身MRI的诊断准确率为89%(56/63),SPECT的诊断准确率为83%(52/63),两者之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论SPECT与TIM能有效地检出全身骨转移癌灶,但TIM对骨髓病变有较高的空间分辨率,比SPECT的诊断正确率更高。 Objective To discuss the diagnostic value of MRI with total imaging matrix (TIM)for bone metastases. Materials and Methods 25 patients with malignant tumors underwent whole body SPECT as well as MRI with total imaging matrix techniques,the results were compared. Results In 25 patients, 54 malignant and 9 benign bone lesions were detected by MR TIM and SPECT. The sensitivity of TIM techniques was 93% (50/54) , SPECT achieved 87% (47/54 ;P 〉 0.05 ) , specificity was 67% ( 6/9 ) for TIM techniques and 56% (5/9) for SPECT ( P 〉 0.05 ). negative predictive and positive predictive value were 60% ( 6/10 ) and 94% ( 50/53 ) for TIM techniques, and 42% ( 5/12 ) and 92% ( 47/51 ) for SPECT. Diagnostic accuracy was 89% ( 56/63 ) for MRI and 83% for SPECT( 52/63 ; P 〈 0. 001 ), respectively. Conclusion MRI wih TIM techniques and SPECT are useful imaging modalities for a systemic screening for metastatic bone disease. MRI with TIM techniques has higher spatial resolution for bone marrow than that in SPECT.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第7期708-711,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 磁共振成像 全景矩阵成像 核素骨显像 骨转移瘤 Magnetic resonance imaging Total imaging matrix Single photon emission computed tomography Bone metastases
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Rubens RD.Bone metastases:the clinical problem.Eur J Cancer,1998,34:210.
  • 2Eustace S,Tello R,DeCarvalho V,et al.A comparison of wholebedy turbo STIR MR imaging and plana99 m TC-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of pailents with suspected skeletal metastases.MR,1997,169:1655.
  • 3Vanel D,Dromain C,Tardivon A.MRI of bone marrow disorders.Eur Radiol,2000,10:224.
  • 4Edelstyn GA,Gillespie PJ,Grebbel FS.The radiological demonstraton of osseous metastases:Experimental observations.Clin Radiol,1967,18:158.
  • 5Aitchison FA,Poon FW,Hadlev MD,et al.Vertebral metastases and an equivocal bone scan:Value of magnetic resonance imaging.NuclMed Commun,1992,13:429.
  • 6Algra PR,Bloem JL,Tissing H,et al.Detection of vertebral metastases:Comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy.Radiographies,1991,11:219.
  • 7KhuranaJS.RosenthalDI,Rosenberg AE,et al.Skeletal metasstasesinli-bosarcoma detectableonly by magnetic resonance imaging.ClinOr-thop,1989,243:204.
  • 8Diederich S,Wormanns D,Semik M,et al.Screening for early lung callcer with low-dose spiral CT:Prevalence in 817 asymptomatie smokers.Radiology,2002,773.
  • 9Even-Sapir E,Metser U,Flussor G,et al.Assessment of malignant skeletal disease:Initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.J Nuel Med,2004,45:272.
  • 10林景辉,朱玫,蒋学祥,王荣福,张旭初.骨显像与磁共振成像检测骨转移灶的对比研究[J].中华核医学杂志,2000,20(4):184-184. 被引量:16

二级参考文献3

  • 1Isabelle Perrin-Resche,Yves Bizais,Thierry Buhe,Maryse Fiche. How does iliac crest bone marrow biopsy compare with imaging in the detection of bone metastases in small cell lung cancer?[J] 1993,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(5):420~425
  • 2Susan V. Kattapuram M.D.,Jasvir S. Khurana M.B., M.S. (Orth),James A. Scott M.D.,Georges Y. El-Khoury M.D.. Negative scintigraphy with positive magnetic resonance imaging in bone metastases[J] 1990,Skeletal Radiology(2):113~116
  • 3岳殿超,曾世荃,胡平,吴克宁,石锐.下胸椎及腰椎SPECT显像对骨良恶性病变的鉴别[J].中华核医学杂志,1998,18(1):50-51. 被引量:13

共引文献32

同被引文献64

引证文献5

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部