期刊文献+

Field Evaluation of Alternative Testing Strategies for the Detection of HIV Infection in Beijing

Field Evaluation of Alternative Testing Strategies for the Detection of HIV Infection in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 To identify a cost-efficient altemative antibody testing strategy for screening and confirmation of HIV infection by rapid simple tests (RSTs) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Methods Four RSTs (RST1, RST2, RST3, and RST4 ) and five ELISAs (ELISA1, ELISA2, ELISA3, ELISA4, and ELISA5) were evaluated in two phases by using banked and serum specimens prospectively collected at regional hospitals and voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) centers in Beijing. A total of 200 banked serum specimens were included in the first phase, including 62 HIV-positive, 127 HIV-negative and 11 indeterminate specimens. All specimens were tested by four RSTs and five ELISAs respectively. The second phase involved prospective testing of 389 routine specimens, including 92 HIV-positive, 287 HIV-negative, and 10 indeterminate specimens. All the specimens were tested by two RSTs (RST2 and RST4) and three ELISAs (ELISA1, ELISA3, and ELISA4), which were selected for their respective excellent sensitivity and/or specificity. Westem blot (WB) was used as a gold standard for confirming the reactivity of all the specimens. Results Sensitivity, specificity, and efficacy were calculated for each assay in two phases. In the first phase, four assays (ELISA4, RST2, RST3, and RST4) had a specificity of 100%. For the determination of efficacy, ELISA4, RST2, and RST4 were selected in the second phase. ELISA1 and ELISA3 which have a sensitivity of 95.9% and 93.2% respectively also entered this phase. In the second phase, all the five assays (ELISA1, ELISA3, ELISA4, RST2, and RST4) had a sensitivity and specifity of over 90%. ELISA1 had a sensitivity of 99% and ELISA4 a specificity of 99%. Conclusion The sensitivity ELISA1 and the specificit of ELISA4 are comparable to ELISA/WB standard strategy. Application of this alternative testing strategy provides a cost-effective method for determining HIV prevalence in Beijing. To identify a cost-efficient altemative antibody testing strategy for screening and confirmation of HIV infection by rapid simple tests (RSTs) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Methods Four RSTs (RST1, RST2, RST3, and RST4 ) and five ELISAs (ELISA1, ELISA2, ELISA3, ELISA4, and ELISA5) were evaluated in two phases by using banked and serum specimens prospectively collected at regional hospitals and voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) centers in Beijing. A total of 200 banked serum specimens were included in the first phase, including 62 HIV-positive, 127 HIV-negative and 11 indeterminate specimens. All specimens were tested by four RSTs and five ELISAs respectively. The second phase involved prospective testing of 389 routine specimens, including 92 HIV-positive, 287 HIV-negative, and 10 indeterminate specimens. All the specimens were tested by two RSTs (RST2 and RST4) and three ELISAs (ELISA1, ELISA3, and ELISA4), which were selected for their respective excellent sensitivity and/or specificity. Westem blot (WB) was used as a gold standard for confirming the reactivity of all the specimens. Results Sensitivity, specificity, and efficacy were calculated for each assay in two phases. In the first phase, four assays (ELISA4, RST2, RST3, and RST4) had a specificity of 100%. For the determination of efficacy, ELISA4, RST2, and RST4 were selected in the second phase. ELISA1 and ELISA3 which have a sensitivity of 95.9% and 93.2% respectively also entered this phase. In the second phase, all the five assays (ELISA1, ELISA3, ELISA4, RST2, and RST4) had a sensitivity and specifity of over 90%. ELISA1 had a sensitivity of 99% and ELISA4 a specificity of 99%. Conclusion The sensitivity ELISA1 and the specificit of ELISA4 are comparable to ELISA/WB standard strategy. Application of this alternative testing strategy provides a cost-effective method for determining HIV prevalence in Beijing.
出处 《Biomedical and Environmental Sciences》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2007年第4期265-268,共4页 生物医学与环境科学(英文版)
基金 As part of the AIDS Prevention Applied Research and Program of the Ministry of Health (WA2003-17) the present study is supportedby the Department of Reference,National Center for AIDS Control and Prevention,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
关键词 Human immunodeficiency virus type-l Altemative testing strategy Rapid simple test Enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay Human immunodeficiency virus type-l Altemative testing strategy Rapid simple test Enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Dax E M (1993).HIV testing and staging,disease progression,and markers.Curr Opin Infect Dis 6,191-199.
  • 2Constantine N T,Zekeng L,Sangare A K,et al.(1998).Diagnostic challenges for rapid human immunodeficiency virus assays.J Hum Virol 1,45-51.
  • 3Downing R G,Otten,R A,Marum A,et al.(1998).Optimising the delivery of HIV counselling and testing:the Uganda experience using rapid HIV antibody test algorithms.J Aquir Immune Defic Syndr 18,384-388.
  • 4WHO (1998).The importance of simple/rapid assays in HIV testing.Wkly Epidemiol Rec 73,321-328.
  • 5Doyle N M,Levison J E,Gardner M O (2005).Rapid HIV versus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay screening in a low-risk Mexican American population presenting in labor:a cost-effectiveness analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(3 Pt 2),1280-1285.
  • 6Stetler H C,Granade T C,Nunez C A,et al.(1997).Field evaluation of rapid HIV serologic tests for screening and confirming HIV-1 infection in Honduras.AIDS 11,369-375.
  • 7Meless H,Tegbaru B,Messele T,et al.(2002).Evaluation of rapid assays for screening and confirming HIV-1 infection in Ethiopia.Ethiop Med J 40(Suppl 1),27-36.
  • 8WHO Global Programme on AIDS (1990).Proposed WHO criteria for interpretation of results from Western blot assay for HIV-1,HIV-2 and HTLV-Ⅰ/HTLV-Ⅱ.WHO Wkly Epidemol Rec 37,281-283.
  • 9Bhore A V,Sastry J,Patke D,et al.(2003).Sensitivity and specificity of rapid HIV testing of pregnant women in India.Int J STD AIDS 14(1),37-41.
  • 10Urassa W,Nozohoor S,Jaffer S,et al.(2002).Evaluation of an alternative confirmatory strategy for the diagnosis of HIV infection in Dar Es Salaam,Tanzania,based on simple rapid assays.J Virol Methods 100(1-2),115-120.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部