期刊文献+

古土壤中胡敏酸和胡敏素^(14)C测年值统计分析 被引量:2

STATISTICS ANALYSIS ON THE ^(14)C AGE OF HUMIC ACID AND HUMIN IN PALEOSOL
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文中使用统计方法对44个不同气候条件下形成的古土壤中胡敏酸、胡敏素的14C测年结果进行分析,探讨不同组分14C年龄的可靠性。对比和统计分析结果表明,从总体上胡敏素可能是古土壤中最古老的惰性组分,其14C年龄可代表古土壤形成(平均)年龄;形成于晚更新世的地质样品胡敏酸与胡敏素的14C年龄差异并不明显,但全新世尤其晚全新世的沉积物中胡敏酸与胡敏素的14C年龄差异比较显著,可能因埋藏较浅而受到更多的污染影响;对全新世(尤其晚全新世)古土壤样品开展不同组分14C测年是保证地质事件年龄准确可靠的有效手段。 Based on 44 ^14C dates of humic acids and humins under different weather conditions, a statistics analysis was made to estimate their performance in paleosols. The following suggestions are reached: (1) A normal distribution analysis for HA/HM values deduced from 44 ^14C dates results in average value of 0.98 with standard deviation of 0.20. This seems that the humin may be the oldest fraction of soil and its ^14C age can represent the age of the paleosol. (2) The relationship between HA/HM value and the age of paleosol samples shows that the ages of humic acid and humin are indistinguishable for samples deposited in late Quaternary, but are obviously different from paleosol samples in Holocene. Their different behaviors in late Quaternary and Holocene may be related to the pollutant due to Holocene soil exposed to the surface and easily influenced by pollutant. Therefore it is suggested to use the different fractions for Holocene soil to obtain reliable radiocarbon ages for soil samples. (3) Assuming that the modern carbon pollutant entered into soil one-off, the amount of modern carbon into original carbon is estimated to be about 1.49% for late Quaternary soil sample, but this value increases to 21.37% in Holocene soil. Therefore, the amount of pollutant for Holocene soil is over 15 times than that for late Quaternary soil. If such pollutant continues to enter into soil with similar quantity during deposition, the impact percentages are 5.71% and 30.46% for late Quaternary and Holocene soil samples, respectively. The amount of modern carbon by continuously entering into soil is 2.6 times that of the one-off entering into soil for one sample in the same condition. It is further needed to state that which fractions could obtain more reliable ages for soil samples still depends on other factors such as geomorphic location, climatic zone, and soil type.
出处 《地震地质》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期381-389,共9页 Seismology and Geology
基金 国家发展与改革委员会发改投资"城市活断层试验探测"项目(20041138) 地震科学联合基金(199063)共同资助
关键词 古土壤 ^14C测年 胡敏酸 胡敏素 paleosol, radiocarbon dating, humic acid, humin
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献81

  • 1尹功明,黄景杨,罗荫权.零口文化层的热释光年龄[J].考古与文物,2002(1):91-93. 被引量:4
  • 2刘良梧,茅昂江,P.Becker-Heidman,H.W.Scharpenseel.栗钙土的年龄[J].土壤学报,1989,26(2):159-164. 被引量:6
  • 3龚子同,刘良梧,周瑞荣.南海诸岛土壤的形成和年龄[J].第四纪研究,1996,16(1):88-95. 被引量:12
  • 4王挺梅 李建平.唐山大地震的重复间隔[J].地震地质,1984,6(3):77-83.
  • 5国家地震局地质研究所 云南地震局.滇西北活动断裂[M].北京:地震出版社,1990..
  • 6邓起东.断层性状、盆地类型及其形成机制[J].地震科学研究,1984,(2):57-64.
  • 7邓起东 国家地震局地质研究所.地震地表破裂参数与震级关系的研究.活动断裂研究(2)[M].北京:地震出版社,1992.247-264.
  • 8冉勇康 李志义 等.河西走廊黑河口断层上的古地震及年代学研究[J].地震地质,1988,10(4):118-126.
  • 9黄昭.贺兰山东麓断层崖的形态与年代测定方法.现代地壳运动研究(3)[M].北京:地震出版社,1987.63-82.
  • 10国家地震局(鄂尔多斯周缘活动断裂系)课题组.鄂尔多斯活动断裂系[M].北京:地震出版社,1988..

共引文献138

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部