期刊文献+

已婚男性性商量表的编制与信效度检验 被引量:4

Development and psychometric analysis of sex quotient scale for married males
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制测量已婚男性性商量表,检验其信度和效度。方法用已婚男性性商量表测量全国9个省(市)22~70岁已婚男性520人,回收有效问卷477人,效标样本192人,间隔2周重测样本32人。通过因子分析等考察量表的信度与效度。结果新编量表条目与总分相关在0.450到0.723之间,各条目决断值(CR)均有显著性;重测信度为0.981,Cronbach’sα系数为0.940,分半信度为0.905;通过探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,解释方差总变异的55.90%,因子载荷在0.420~0.755之间。新编量表总分以及五个分量表(性生理、性心理、性爱抚、性欲、性交流)与效标Olson婚姻质量问卷(ENRICH)三个分量表和国际勃起功能指数-5(IIEF-5)有一定的正相关,相关系数在0.249~0.710之间。结论已婚男性性商量表具有较好的信度和效度,可以用于我国男性性健康水平的评估。 Objective To develop sex quotient scale for married males (SQS-M) and assess its reliability and validity. Methods SQS-M was administered to 520 married males aged 22 - 70 from 9 provinces of China, and 477 copies were effective. 192 subjects were tested with the criterion scales, and 32 were retested with SQS-M after 2 weeks. The reliabilities and validities of SQS-M were examined by factor analysis and other methods. Results SQS-M' s correlation between each item and total score is 0. 450 - 0.723, all having significant CR values. The retest reliability is 0. 981 ; cronbach' sot is 0.940; split reliability is 0. 905. Exploratory factor analysis results in a 5-factor model, accounting for 55.90% of total variance, with factor loadings between 0.420 - 0.732. The correlations between SQS-M' s subscales (sexual physiology, sexual psychology, sexual caress, sexual desire, sexual communication) and Olson'sMarital Quality Inventory' s 3 subscales (husband-wife communication, sexual life, marriage satisfaction) from ENRICH,and the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) , are positive, ( r = 0.249 -0.710). Conclusion SQS-M has good psychometric properties and can be used in assessing the sexual health of Chinese married males.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2007年第8期750-752,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金 校“985工程”二期建设项目(985-Ⅱ-027-39)
关键词 性商 心理测量 量表 信度 效度 Sex quotient Psychometrics Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王河.性商理论及性商测试初探[J].中华中西医临床杂志,2004,4:65-65.
  • 2Clive MD, Handbook of sexuality-related measures. London : Sage Publications, 1998.1-584.
  • 3Clayton AH, Mc Garvey EL, Clavet GJ. The Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire ( CSFQ ) : Development, reliability and validity. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 1997,33:731-745.
  • 4Rust J. The GRISS: A psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction. Archives of Behavior, 1986,15 : 153-161.
  • 5王方,赵鹏飞,江鱼.性功能电脑测评与诊断系统在男性性功能障碍诊断中的应用[J].男性学杂志,1996,10(3):150-152. 被引量:9
  • 6Olson DH. Prepare-Enrich : Counselor's Manual. Minneapolis, MN, Prepare-Enrich, 1982.
  • 7孟凡敏,高维忠,张京东.勃起功能障碍的心理因素分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2004,13(3):284-285. 被引量:11
  • 8Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The International Index for Erectile Function (ⅡEF) : a multidimensional scale for assessment for erectile dysfunction. Urology, 1993,46:697-706.
  • 9秦浩,陈景武.医学量表条目的筛选考评方法及其应用[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(4):375-376. 被引量:173
  • 10Derogatis LR. The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. Journal of Sex Marital Therapy, 1976,5:244-281.

二级参考文献10

共引文献191

同被引文献28

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部