期刊文献+

科学中的实用论证 被引量:1

On the Practical Argument of Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一般论证主要由根据、理由和主张三个部分组成,实用论证分别为这三个部分增加了支持、限定和反驳三个因素。其实,在科学史上,达尔文在论证他自己的理论时早就使用了这种论证。实用论证有可能为实现逻辑论证与修辞论证的有机结合,为走出绝对主义与相对主义的内在困境,为更合理地理解科学发展提供方法论上的启迪。 By means of the analysis of Tulmin's Practical Argument and the historic case research of Darwin's Origin of Species will the advantages and disadvantages of practical argument of science be given in detail.In conclusion,a properly constituted practical argument of science will probably facilitate a new approach to the contemporary philosophy of science.
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期40-43,共4页 Science Technology and Dialectics
基金 教育部2004年哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"当代科学哲学发展趋势研究"(04JZD0004)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Stephen Tulmin. The Uses of Argument [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958. 145.
  • 2肖显静.科学哲学研究三大转向的内涵及意义简析——《科学实在论的方法论辩护》的启发[J].科学技术与辩证法,2006,23(2):52-56. 被引量:2
  • 3W.C.丹皮尔.科学史[M].广西:广西师范大学出版社,2001.265,268-269,264-265,268.
  • 4达尔文.物种起源[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002.184-185.
  • 5Marcello Pera. The Discourses of Science [ M ]. Chicago:University of ChicagoPress, 1994. 132,156.
  • 6Charles Darwin. The Origin of Species[M]. London: JohnMurry, 1911. 80 - 81,190.

二级参考文献11

  • 1郭贵春.科学知识动力学[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,1992.4、115.
  • 2R.Camap,Introduction to Semantics[M].Harvard University Press,1942.9.
  • 3C.Hernpel.Two Models of Scientific Explanation[ J ].in:Y.Balashov and A.Rosenberg,Philosophy of Science,Routledge,2002.52.
  • 4B.Frassen.the Pragmatics of Explanation[ J ].in:Y.Bakashov and A.Rosenberg Philosophy of Science,Routledge,2002.64.
  • 5Jarrett Leplin.A Novel Defence of Scientific Realism[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1997.11.
  • 6P.Ricorur,the Rule of Metaphor[M].Toronto:University of Toronto Press,1977.220.
  • 7Alan H.Grow,The Rhetoric of Science[M].Harvard University Press,1990.7.
  • 8Gianni Vattimo,The End of Modernity:Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-Modern Culture[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1988.137.
  • 9Alan G.Gross and Wiliiam M.Keith,Rhetorical Hermeneutics:Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science,State University of New York Press,1997.72.
  • 10Randy Allen Harris.Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science:Case Stuties[M].New Jersey:Lawrence Eerlbaum Associates Publishers,1997.xix.

共引文献5

同被引文献11

  • 1晋荣东.《现代逻辑的理性观及其知识论根源》,《第二届两岸逻辑教学学术会议论文集》,2006,第490-492页.
  • 2Stephen Toulmin, Return to Reason, Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 2001, p. 24, p. 80.
  • 3[德]罗伯特·阿列克西.《法律论证理论--作为法律证立理论的理性论辩原则》,第113页.
  • 4Grennan, Wayne, Informal Logic : Issues and Technipue, McGill - Queen' s University Press, 1997, p. 67.
  • 5Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R. , & Kruiger, T. , The Study of Argumentation, New York : Irvington, 1984, p. 205.
  • 6Freeman, J. , Dialectice and the Macrostructure of Arguments, New York : Foris, 1991, pp. 53 - 72.
  • 7Johnson, R. H. , The Rise of Informal Logic, Newport News, VA : Vale Press, 1996, pp. 129 - 130.
  • 8Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R. & Snoeck Henkemans, Fundamentals of Argunentation Theory, Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum, 1996,p. 155, p. 155.
  • 9Toulmin, Stephen, The Use of Argument, Cambridge University Press, 1958, p. 95.
  • 10Willard, Charles Arthur, Field Theory : Cartesian Meditaion, in Dimensicns of Argument : Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation, ed. George Ziegelmuller and Jack Rhodes, 1982, p. 2143.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部