期刊文献+

解析新卢德主义对电视的声讨 被引量:1

Analyses on the Condemnatory Critiques of the Neo-Luddites against Televisions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 杰瑞.曼德尔和尼尔.波兹曼是新卢德主义两位重要人物,解析他们的电视批判思想对于认识新卢德主义技术思想具有重要意义。杰瑞.曼德尔提出消除电视有四个理由;尼尔.波兹曼提出电视造就一个没有童年的时代、电视的娱乐功能导致人的毁灭的思想。最后分析了新卢德主义电视批判思想的意义与局限。 Jerry Mander and Neil Postman are key figures of the neo-Ludditism Movement.In order to understand the technological philosophy of the neo-Ludditism better,it is important to analyze their condemnatory critiques against televisions.Jerry Mander elucidated four arguments for the elimination of television;Neil Postman proposed that televisions resulted in 'the Disappearance of Childhood' and 'Amusing ourselves to Death'.Finally,this paper reviews the condemnatory critiques of the Neo-Luddites against televisions briefly.
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期67-69,共3页 Science Technology and Dialectics
基金 辽宁省高等学校人文社科重点研究基地项目(J05009)
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Jerry Mander. Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television [M]. New York: William Morrow and Company Inc. 1977.52,113,156,261.
  • 2Jerry Mander. In the Absence of the Sacred: the Failure of Technology and the Survival of the Indian Nations[M]. San Francisco: Sierra Club, 1991.97 - 98.
  • 3Neil Postman. The Disappearance of Childhood[M]. Originally Published: New York: Delacorte Press, 1982. Second Published: New York: A Division of Random House, Inc. 1994.
  • 4[美]尼尔·波兹曼.童年的消逝[M].吴燕莛,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.
  • 5Neil Postman. Amusing ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business[M]. First Published: Linotron Meridien: Viking Penguin,Inc. 1985.
  • 6波兹曼.娱乐至死[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.
  • 7N.波兹曼.娱乐至死[M].章艳译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.202,103.

共引文献46

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部