期刊文献+

中文版晚期老年痴呆症疼痛评估量表的初步评价 被引量:39

Initial validation of Chinese Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (C-PAINAD)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对中文版晚期老年痴呆症疼痛评估量表(C-PAINAD)作出初步的评价,探讨其在中国应用的可行性。方法通过反复对照评核,将量表翻译成中文版,然后对11例认知能力严重受损的老年痴呆患者进行观察评估。评估工具包括C-PAINAD、不舒服视觉模拟量表(DVA)及费城老年学中心情感量表(PGCAR)。采用相关性分析、单因素方差检验及因子分析检验C-PAINAD的可靠性及有效性。结果C-PAINAD的评分集中于0分附近。其与DVA及负面情感均有良好及显著的相关性,但与正面情感的相关程度较差,能够有效测评不同状态下的疼痛程度。因子分析的贡献率是51.20%(CronbachUs α=0.66),显示PAINAD具有良好的可靠性及有效性。结论C-PAINAD能够可靠并有效地评估晚期老年痴呆症患者的疼痛程度。建议在进行进一步信度及效度分析研究时,可给予止痛药进行前后对照比较,以确定C-PAINAD在临床及研究上的应用价值。 Objective To validate the translated Chinese version of Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (C-PAINAD) for its clinical application in assessing the discomfort level of severely cognitive impaired patients. Methods In developing the C-PAINAD, both clinical and academic experts were engaged in an iterative translation process for ensuring its semantic equivalence with its original language as well as it comprehensibility for clinical application. In establishing C-PAINAD's interrater reliability, its applicability for clinical use is further assessed in 11 severely cognitive impaired patients. The assessment tools included C-PAINAD, Discomfort Visual Analog Scale (DVA), and Philadelphia Geriatric Center Affect Rating Scale (PGCAR). Correlations, ANOVA and factor analysis were undertaken to examine the reliability and validity of C-PAINAD. Results The scores of C-PAINAD were not in normal distribution but clustered around Zero. C-PAINAD was positively correlated with DVA and negative affect but mildly and negatively correlated with positive affect. It was able to detect different pain level under different condition. One factor was extracted and the percentage of variance was 51.20%. C-PAINAD was proved to have satisfactory reliability and validity (Cronbach's α=0.66). Conclusions C-PAINAD was a simple, reliable and effective pain assessment instrument for measuring pain level of non-communicative patients like advanced dementia. Further research is deemed necessary to conduct with pre-and post-test of analgesic prescriptions prior to wider clinical application.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第8期677-680,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
基金 大学科研资助基金(G-YD92)赞助
关键词 阿尔茨海默病 疼痛 评价研究 Alzheimer disease Pain Evaluation studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1赵继军,陆小英,赵存凤,庹焱.数字疼痛量表和描述疼痛量表的相关性研究和改进[J].现代护理,2002,8(9):657-661. 被引量:153
  • 2吴燕萍,覃惠英,范育英,洗慕慈,钟慧仪,汪国成.中国人癌症疼痛评估工具效度与信度的分析[J].护士进修杂志,2001,16(10):737-738. 被引量:31
  • 3黄泳,王升旭,符仲华.浮针治疗675例疼痛的简化McGiLL疼痛量表评价[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2001,7(2):65-66. 被引量:11
  • 4Closs SJ,Barr B,Briggs M,et al.A comparison of five pain assessment scales for nursing home residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment[J].J Pain Manage,2004,27(3):196-205.
  • 5Manz BD,Mosier R,Nusser-Gerlach MA,et al.Pain assessment in the cognitive impaired and unimpaired elderly[J].Pain Manage Nursing,2000,1(4):106-115.
  • 6Warden V,Hurley AC,Volicer L.Development and psychometric evaluation of the pain assessment in advanced dementia (PAINAD)scale[J].J Am Med Directors Assoc,2003,4(1):9-15.
  • 7Reisberg B,Sclan SG,Franssen E,et al.Dementia staging in chronic care populations[J].Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders,1994,8(Suppl.1):S188-205.
  • 8Chiu FKH,Lee HC,Chung WS,et al.Reliability and validity of the cantonese version of mini-mental stage examination-A preliminary study[J].J.HK Coll.Psychiatr,1994,4(SP2):25-28.
  • 9Bellelli G,Frisoni GB,Bianchetti A,et al.The Bedford Alzheimer nursing severity sclae for the severely demented:Validation study[J].Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord,1997,11(2):71-77.
  • 10Lawton MP,Haitsma KV,Klapper J.Observed affect in nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease[J].J Gerontology,1996,51(1):3-14.

二级参考文献21

  • 1[1]Puntillo KA , Stannard D , Miaskowski C , et al. Use of a pain assessment and intervention notation (P.A.I.N.) tool in critical care nursing practice: Nurses' evaluations[J]. Heart Lung,2002,31(4): 303-314
  • 2[2]Fuller BF ,Neu M .Validity and reliability of a practice-based infant pain assessment instrument[J]. Clin Nurs Res. 2000,9(2): 124-143
  • 3[3]Merkel S , Malviya S . Pediatric pain, tools, and assessment[J]. Perianesth Nurs. 2000,15(6): 408-414
  • 4[4]Schtt J,Huskisson E C.Graphic representation of pain[J].Pain,1976,2( 2):175-184
  • 5[5]Graham C,Bond SS, Gerkovich M,et al. Use of McGill Pain Questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency[J]. Pain,1980,8(3):377-387
  • 6McCaffery M,Pasero C L. Pain ratings:the fifth vital sign[J]. Am J Nurs, 1997,97(2) : 15-- 16.
  • 7Merboth M K, Barnason S. Managing pain: the fifth vital sign [ J ]. Nuts Clin North Am,2000,35(2) :375-383.
  • 8Wang X, Li T, Yu S, et al. China:statusof pain and palliative care[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2002, 24 ( 2 ) : 177179.
  • 9McCaffery M, Ferrdl B R. Nurses"knowledge of pain assessment and management: how much progress have wemade[ J ]? J Pain Syrnlrmtn Manage,1997,14(3) : 175-- 188.
  • 10McCaffery M,Robinson E S. Your patient is in paln:here's how you respond[J].Nursing, 2002,32(10) :36-45.

共引文献356

同被引文献404

引证文献39

二级引证文献518

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部