期刊文献+

企业管理者工作压力源的结构与属性——以浙江省企业为实证 被引量:10

A Study on the Structures and Attributes of Managerial Work Stressors in Firm:a Case from Zhejiang Province
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以浙江省企业管理人员为样本进行问卷调查,综合运用探索性和验证性因素分析方法,构建了我国企业管理人员工作压力源的七因素模型,并将这些因素界定为内源压力和外源压力两类。通过与管理者绩效建立关联,进一步区分了各种压力源因素的属性。 This paper surveys 280 business managers in Zhejiang province with a series of questionnaire designed by us, and concludes a 7-dimension model of managerial work stressors by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. These factors can be classified into two different stressors which are endogenous stressor and exogenous stressor. As for the managerial performance criterions, the two stressors have different impacts. These conclusions are availably for stress management practice.
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第15期38-41,共4页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"工作压力作用效能定位诊断与多相测评方法研究"(70372022)。
关键词 企业管理者 工作压力源 验证性因素分析 business manager work stressors confirmatory factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Cooper C L,Sloan S,Williams S. Occupational Stress Indicator: Management Guide [M]. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1998.
  • 2Siu O L, Luo L, Cooper C L. Managerial Stress in Hong Kong and Taiwan:A Comparative Study[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1999, (1).
  • 3舒晓兵,廖建桥.国企管理人员工作压力源与工作满意度实证研究[J].工业工程与管理,2003,8(2):34-37. 被引量:44
  • 4Borman W C, MotowicUo S J. Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance[C]/ /Schmitt N, Borman W C. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993:71-98.
  • 5Fevre M L, Matheny J, Kolt G S. Eustress, Distress, and Interpretation in Occupational Stress[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2003,18(7): 726-744.
  • 6温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194. 被引量:1240

二级参考文献33

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1282

同被引文献107

引证文献10

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部