期刊文献+

基于优势粗糙集的教学研究型大学学科建设绩效评价 被引量:14

The Performance Evaluation on Discipline Construction of Teaching and Research University Based on Dominance Rough Set Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学科建设绩效反映了一所高校的整体办学水平和综合实力,本文制定了学科建设绩效评价的指标体系,收集了某教学研究型大学近5年的学科建设绩效资料,构建了学科建设绩效评价偏好决策表。在此基础上,将优势粗糙集理论应用于学科建设绩效评价中,获取的偏好决策规则对学科建设绩效进行了合理分类和分级评价,达到了总结评估的目的,提取的知识可为学科建设绩效评价提供指导性的决策建议。 The performance of discipline construction reflects the overall teaching level and comprehensive capacity. The index for the performance evaluation on discipline construction is set up, and a preference decision table is formed by gathering data about discipline construction of a key university within resent 5 years. Then the dominance rough set approach is applied to the performance evaluation of discipline construction. The preference decision rules formed is of ability to reasonably classify and evaluate different level of performance of discipline construction, realizing the purpose of summarization and evaluation. Knowledge abstracted can provide decision suggestion to the disciphne construction of higher education institutions.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 2007年第3期132-136,共5页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70473037) 江苏省自然科学基金重点资助项目(BK2003211) 南京航空航天大学特聘教授和创新群体科研基金(1009-26001)
关键词 优势粗糙集理论 学科建设 绩效评估 Based-dominance rough set theory discipline construction performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1曾黄麟.粗集理论及其应用(一)[J].四川轻化工学院学报,1996,9(1):18-28. 被引量:41
  • 2McSherry D. Knowledge discovery by inspection[J].Decision Support Systems, 1997,21 : 43 - 47.
  • 3Pomerol J C. Artificial intelligence and human decision making[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997,99:3-25.
  • 4Slowinski R. Intelligent decision support: handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory[M]. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers,1992.23-33.
  • 5Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Multiple criteria decision making[A]. Proc of the 12th International Conference[C]. Berlin: Springer, 1997. 318-329.
  • 6Bouyssou D. Outranking relations :do they have special properties? [J]. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1996,5(2):99-111.
  • 7Greco S,Matarazzo B,Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001,129:1 - 47.
  • 8Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough approximation by dominance relations [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2002, ( 17): 153-171.
  • 9Polkowski L, Skowron A. Rough methodology[A].Charlotte N C, eds. Proc of the Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems[C]. Berlin:Springer Verlag, 1994.85-94.
  • 10寥春丽.[D].天津:河北工业大学,2003.

共引文献234

同被引文献142

引证文献14

二级引证文献250

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部