摘要
目的:比较钛板坚强内固定术和颌间牵引修复颌骨骨折的疗效,分析颌骨骨折术后影响功能恢复的相关因素。方法:124例颌骨骨折患者,采用口内或口外入路手术,以钛板坚强内固定或联合颌间牵引进行修复,术后随访6~12个月,X线检查骨折愈合情况。实验数据采用SPSS10.0统计软件进行Ridit分析。结果:钛板坚强内固定联合颌间牵引组治愈41例、显效8例、无效4例,钛板坚强内固定组治愈33例、显效6例、无效3例,颌间牵引组治愈7例、显效11例、无效11例。经Ridit分析,P<0.01,有统计学意义,三者有显著性差异。结论:采用钛板对颌骨骨折进行坚强内固定,可使其达到早期功能复位与重建的良好效果。如联合颌间牵引,则效果良好。
PURPOSE: To observe the clinical effect of internal fixation with titanium plate and intermaxillary traction to treat jaw fracture,and analyse the correlative factors affecting recovery of function after treatment. METHODS: 124 patients with jaw fractures were treated with titanium plate and/or interrnaxillary traction in rigid internal fixation and were followed up for 6 to 12 months. Bone healing of these cases was observed through X-ray examination. The data was analyzed with SPSS10.0 software package for Ridit analysis. RESULTS: In the group of patients with titanium plate and intermaxillary traction,41 cases had excellent result, 8 cases had good results, while 4 cases failed to the treatment. In the group of patients with titanium plate, 33 cases had excellent results, 6 cases had good results, while 3 cases failed to the treatment. In the group of patients with intermaxillary traction, 7 cases had excellent results, 11 cases had good results, while 11 cases failed to the treatment. Three was significant difference among the 3 groups (P〈0.001). CONCLUSION: As a method for treatment of jaw fracture, RIF reduces time of treatment. RIF combined with intermaxillary traction can achieve good results.
出处
《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》
CAS
2007年第4期277-280,共4页
China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
关键词
颌骨骨折
钛板
坚强内固定
颌间牵引
Jaw fracture
Titanium plate
Rigid internal fixation
Intermaxillary traction