关于义务教育阶段解决择校收费问题政策方案的渐进模型
摘要
在我国体制转型期,义务教育择校收费问题成为政府关注的焦点之际,本文从观念层面和实践层面以及二者结合的角度,探讨政策方案价值认同的渐进性、政策过程的阶段性和政策方案价值认同程度的加深与政策过程具体阶段推进之间的一致性,提出了该政策方案的渐进模型。
出处
《教育导刊（上半月）》
北大核心
2007年第8期14-16,共3页
Journal of Educational Development
二级参考文献28
-
1Walford, G. (ed.) 1996. School Choice and Quasi- market. Oxfordshire: Triangle.
-
2Bartlett, W. 1992. Studies in Decentralization and Quasi - markets, Quasi- markets and Educational Reforms: a Case Study. Bristol: University of Bristol. Karsten, S. & Teelken, C. 1996. School Choice in The Netherlands. In G. Walford (ed.) 1996. School Choice and Quasi- market. (pp.16-32). Oxfordshire: Triangle. Gordon, L. 1996. School Choice and the Quasi - market in New Zealand: 'Toraormw' s Schools' today. In G. Walford ( ed. )(1996). School Choice and Quasi-market. (pp.). Oxfordshire: Triangle.
-
3Walford, G. 1996a. School Choice and the Quasi - market. In G. Walford (ed.) (1996). School Choice and Quasi-market. (pp.1-16).Oxfordshire: Triangle.
-
4Gordon, L. 1996. School Choice and the Quasi-market in New Zealand: 'Tomorrow's Schools' today. In G. Walford( ed. ) (1996). School Choice and Quasi - market. Oxfordshire: Triangle. p. 131.
-
5Stillman, A. & Maychell, K. 1986. Choosing schools: Parents, LEAs and the 1980 Education Act. Windsor: NFER- Nel son. 转引自Karsten, S. & Teelken, C. 1996. School Choice in The Netherlands. In G. Walford (ed.) 1996. School Choice and Quasi - market. (pp. 16 - 32). Oxfordshire: Triangle.p.22.
-
6OECD. 1994. School: a matter of choice. Paris: OECD. Walford, G. 1996a. School Choice and the Quasi - market. In G. Walford (ed.) (1996). School Choice and Quasi- market. (pp. 1 - 16). Oxfordshire: Triangle.
-
7Marginson, S. 1996. Marketisation in Australian Schooling.In G. Walford (ed.) 1996. School Choice and Quasi - market.pp. 111 - 127.Oxfordshire: Triangle.p.112.p.114.
-
8Fox, I. 1985. Private Schools and Public Issues. London: Macmillan. Zanten, A. van. 1996. Market trend in the French school system: overt policy, hidden strategies, actual changes. In G. Walford (ed.) (1996). School Choice and Quasi - mar- ket. pp. 63-75. Oxfordshire: Triangle.
-
9Karsten, S. & Teelken, C. 1996. School Choice in The Netherlands. In G. Walford (ed.) 1996. School Choice and Quasi-market. (pp.16-32). Oxfordshire: Triangle.
-
10Miron, G. 1996. Choice and the Quasi-market in Swedish Education. In G. Walford (ed.) 1996. School Choice and Quasi-market. pp. 33-47. Oxfordshire: Triangle.
共引文献8
-
1王翠娥.英国女子高等教育的发展及其原因探析[J].教育与考试,2009(4):87-92. 被引量：1
-
2鲍传友.论中国教育政策研究的本土化[J].天津市教科院学报,2005,17(3):5-7. 被引量：4
-
3罗云,曾荣光,卢乃桂.新社会背景下教育与经济生活之关系——再思“符应原则”[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(4):87-94. 被引量：12
-
4罗泽意,宁芳艳.英国高等教育演进中的政府角色变迁[J].煤炭高等教育,2008,26(1):52-55.
-
5武彦培.择校现象的中西文化差异[J].现代企业教育,2010(2):165-166.
-
6占盛丽.择校与教育均衡化关系的探讨:基于PISA 2009的实证研究[J].现代基础教育研究,2012,5(1):25-36.
-
7马光绪.高等教育民营化问题探析[J].经营者（学术版）,2013(3):67-68.
-
8王玥琳,Andrew Miles.阶级视域下英国家庭的教育选择与偏好研究[J].外国教育研究,2021,48(11):63-78. 被引量：3
-
1上海市解决“择校问题”的经验与启示[J].教育研究,1998,19(1):14-20.
-
2李明.透视择校收费[J].北京教育（普教版）,2003(12):37-38. 被引量：1
-
3孙鹤娟.关于促进基础教育均衡发展的建议[J].吉林人大,2007,0(8):12-12.
-
4高丹丹,辛翠华.中小学择校收费透析[J].现代中小学教育,1997,13(3):6-8. 被引量：1
-
5苏冉.转型时期道德建设初探[J].安阳工学院学报,2005,4(4):65-66.
-
6祖印.择校失控与教育公平[J].教育研究与实验,1996(4):22-25. 被引量：3
-
7肖远军.教育政策评价的标准探讨[J].浙江教育学院学报,2002(3):86-91. 被引量：10
-
8王杨楠(编译).加拿大：学校编码课程“遇冷”[J].人民教育,2016(22):10-10.
-
9张德超.我与课改的那些事儿[J].江苏教育研究（职教）（C版）,2012(4):16-18.
-
10刘琨.和谐是学校管理中的法宝[J].中小学校长,2014,0(11):56-57. 被引量：1
