期刊文献+

宫颈上皮肉瘤样变Ⅲ宫颈锥切术后的评价 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨宫颈上皮肉瘤样变(CIN)Ⅲ患者行宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性的发生率及再处理的方法与疗效。方法:随机选取因CINⅢ行宫颈锥切术的患者37例,回顾性分析宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性的发生率和再次手术的术式评价与复发的随诊结局。结果:CINⅢ的37例患者中,阴道镜下多点活检的诊断符合率为78.4%;宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性12例,阳性率为32.4%,其中3例浸润癌、3例为原位癌、3例未见病灶、1例为微小浸润癌;切缘阴性25例,失访7例,其余18例中,11例宫颈细胞学检查(LCT)均为阴性,2例为不典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASCUS),2例为CINⅠ~Ⅱ,1例为CINⅡ~Ⅲ。结论:宫颈锥切术治疗CINⅢ是首选,术后切缘阳性的患者仅随诊的风险较大,宜进一步积极处理;切缘阴性有随访条件者可规范定期随访监测疾病变化,否则宜行全子宫切除术。
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 2007年第16期2500-2501,共2页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Costa S,De Nuzzo M,Fanny E,et al.Disease persistence in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization[J].Gynecol Oncol,2002,85 (1):119-124.
  • 2Jain S,Tseng C J,Horng S G,et al.Negative predictive value of human papillomavirus test following conization of the cervix uteri[J].Gynecol Oncol,2001,82(1):177-180.
  • 3樊庆泊,Tay Sun Kuie,沈铿.子宫颈环形电切术在子宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗中的价值[J].中华妇产科杂志,2001,36(5):271-274. 被引量:470
  • 4Orbo A,Arnesen T,Ames M,et al.Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dsplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway:a retrospective long-term follow-up material[J].Gynecol Oncol,2004,93(2):497-483.
  • 5Verguts J,Bronselaer B,Donders G,et al.Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical traepithelial neoplasia:the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation[J].BJOG,2006,113(11):1303-1307.
  • 6Maluf P J,Adad S J,Murta E F.Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade Ⅲ:relation with surgical margins,extension to the crypts and mitoses[J].Tumori,2004,90(5):473-477.
  • 7张洵,李凌,章文华,李淑敏.宫颈冷刀锥切术在宫颈上皮内瘤变诊治中的评价[J].癌症,2003,22(9):994-996. 被引量:63
  • 8徐波,王洁,何秀兰,罗仕萍.宫颈锥切术在子宫颈病变诊治中的作用[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(2):158-159. 被引量:13

二级参考文献27

  • 1Matsuura Y, Kawageo T, Yoki N, et al. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy[J]. Acta Cytol,1996,40:241 - 246.
  • 2Srisomboon J, Tangchaitrong CA, Bhusawang Y, et al.Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 1996, 79:423 -428.
  • 3Chang DY, Cheng WF, Tomg PL, et al. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of coninazation specimens[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1996, 63:53 - 56.
  • 4Cirisano-FD. Management of pre-invasive disease of the cervix[J]. Semin Surg Oncol, 1999, 16:222 - 227.
  • 5Brun JL, Youbi A, Hocke C. Complications, after-effects of conizations and follow-up of patients after treatment: assessment of 3 conization methods[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris), 2002, 31 : 558 - 564.
  • 6Giacalone PL, Laffargue F, Aligier N, et al. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999, 75:356 - 360.
  • 7Huang LW, Hwang JL. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999, 73:12 - 15.
  • 8Duggan-BD, Felix-JC, Muderspach-LI, et al. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 180(2 Pt1): 276 - 282.
  • 9杨学志 郑顺姣 等.子宫颈管储备细胞癌变过程的动态观察[J].中华妇产科杂志,1984,19(4):236-236.
  • 10Ferenczy A,Obstet Gynecol,1996年,87卷,332页

共引文献537

同被引文献17

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部