期刊文献+

非法证据排除规则比较评析 被引量:1

Comparison and appraisal of the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立非法证据排除规则不仅是保障人权、维护法制尊严的需要,而且也是促进案件实体真实发现的需要。我国相关立法和司法解释虽然对非法证据的排除作了一些规定,但其存在的缺陷是明显的。通过对两大法系非法证据排除规则历史发展的考察,提出了设立适宜我国国情的、平衡保障人权和惩罚犯罪双重需要的非法证据排除规则。 Setting up the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence in China does not only meet the needs of human rights and of the maintenance of the dignity of legal system, but also promotes the detection of the entity of law cases. Although relevant legislations and judicial interpretation have made some rules about the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence in China, its defects are evident. The paper, after reviewing the historical development of the two legal systems of exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence, proposes setting up the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence in China which suits our national condition and the dual needs which balance the protection of human rights and the punishment of crimes.
作者 王于红
出处 《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第2期23-26,共4页 Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 非法证据排除规则 比较 评析 the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence comparison appraisal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献7

  • 1左卫民,刘涛.非法证据排除规则的确立与完善[J].法商研究,1999,17(5):12-14. 被引量:48
  • 2Peter Murphy. Murpliy, on Euidence 5th Edition by Blackstone Press Limited 1997.
  • 3Phil Huxley Michael O'Connell, Blackstone's statutes on Evidence 4th Edition by Blackstone Press Limited .1997
  • 4Richard May, Criminal Euidence, by Blackstone Press Limited 1990.
  • 5证据学[M].北京:群众出版社,1983.
  • 6徐益初.对口供的审查和判断[J].北京政法学院学报,1988,(3).
  • 7戴福康.对刑事诉讼证据质和量的探讨[J].法学研究,1988,10(4):52-57. 被引量:28

共引文献81

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部