期刊文献+

属性权重信息不完全区间数多属性决策方法 被引量:3

A New Method for Interval Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Problem with Incomplete Attribute Weights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 依据传统的TOPSIS方法的基本思路,基于相对隶属度法,给出了解决属性权重信息不完全的区间数多属性决策问题的计算步骤。其核心是借助每一方案的综合加权距离求得每个方案相对于优等方案的隶属度,再按隶属度的大小进行决策。该方法克服了以往研究此类问题时所遇到的区间数难以排序的困难,表明相对隶属度法的择优与排序能力要比传统的逼近理想解法强。最后,用实例说明了模型的可行性和有效性。 Based on the conventional TOPSIS and in the light of the relative membership degree method, the calculation steps are given to solve the problem of multiple attribute decision - making with incomplete information on attribute weights. The key is the relative membership degree, which is obtained by means of the synthetically weighted distance. Then, the decision is made according to the relative membership degrees. By using this new method the difficulties that occur in ranking intervals in the traditional analysis methods are overcome. This shows that the relative membership degree method is better in selecting the best and ranking alternatives than the traditional TOP- SIS method. Finally, practical calculations are given, which shows that the models are feasible and practical.
机构地区 空军指挥学院
出处 《空军工程大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期87-90,共4页 Journal of Air Force Engineering University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 军队科研基金资助项目
关键词 多属性决策 相对隶属度法 区间数 multiple attribute decision - making the relative membership degree method interval number
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1王坚强.信息不完全的多准则决策的SIR方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(9):1205-1208. 被引量:15
  • 2Miettinen K, Salminien P. Decision-aid for discrete multiple criteria decision making problems with imprecise[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,119(1):50-60.
  • 3Takeda E, Satoh J. A data envelopment analysis approach to multicriteria decision problems with incomplete information[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2000,39(9-10):81-90.
  • 4Kim S H, Han C H. An interactive procedure for multi-attribute group decision making procedure with incomplete information[J]. Computers & Operational Research, 1999,26(8):755-772.
  • 5Goh C H, Tung Y C A, Cheng C H. A revised weighted sum decision model for robot selection[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1996,30(2):193-199.
  • 6Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.1-10.
  • 7Park K S, Kim S H, Yoon W C. Establishing strict dominance between alternatives with special type of incomplete information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997,96(2):398-406.
  • 8Lee K S, Park K S, Eum Y S, et al. Extended methods for identifying dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001,134(3):557-563.
  • 9Yook K. The Propagation of Errors in Multiple-Attribute Decision Analysis: a Practical Approach[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989,40(7):681-686.
  • 10Bryson N, Mobolurin A. An Action Learning Learning Evaluation Procedure for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996,96:379-386.

共引文献162

同被引文献56

引证文献3

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部